# bolt on ls1 vs bolt on 4.6 stang **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [January 12, 2007, 9:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bolt-on-ls1-vs-bolt-on-4-6-stang/187380 "2007-01-12T21:58:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 47
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2007, 5:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bolt-on-ls1-vs-bolt-on-4-6-stang/187380/47 "2007-03-05T17:40:39Z")
> [@Hope you're a real good swimmer](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hope-youre-a-real-good-swimmer/28540/9): > > I’ve also seen a certain red ws6, only run a 13.7… so i guess that means ws6’s can’t run faster than 13.7 stock? > > The 2003-2004 Mach 1, and the LS1 F-body is a dead heat race… both have actually run high 12’s bone stock, but in the hands of a good driver, typically run low 13s all day long I get your point…but I would consider myself as one of the slower f-bodies. And to sound ricer I did have a glazed ass clutch. BTW on that 13.7 run I spun like mad out of the hole with a 2.2 60’, spun like crazy on the 1-2 so bad I had to let off since I started to go sideways, then I hit the rev limiter at the top of 2nd…I know all this does is point out I suck at driveing (and I dont care) but it also shows the LS1 is pretty badass to do all that and still run a 13.7. Most LS1 f-bodies in stock form I see run 13.1-13.6 range for the most part. I somewhat agree on the Mach 1’s…I have seen a lot run low 13’s but it seems I see a lot more mach 1’s run high 13’s than I do f-bodies. I know this doesnt mean all that much but a LS1 typically traps about 2-3 more MPH than a mach1. But in the end you are right it is a driver’s race. I love Mach1’s…but the GT’s are a pathetic. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bolt-on-ls1-vs-bolt-on-4-6-stang/187380)._