# Brand new 5.0 mustang dyno
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive
**Created:** [March 25, 2010, 1:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115 "2010-03-25T13:23:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 4
### Author:  [@Boost\_Creep](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boost_Creep)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2010, 2:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/61 "2010-03-27T14:15:10Z")
You can get a clean C6Z for 38-40k with like 30kmi.
Gen II GTS’s have peaked my interest as of lately.
---
### Author:  [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2010, 2:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/62 "2010-03-27T14:35:00Z")
> [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/30441/8):
>
> You can get a clean C6Z for 38-40k with like 30kmi.
>
> Gen II GTS’s have peaked my interest as of lately.
Been there, done that, several cool, and not cool things about the car. You don’t seem like the type that would like it, though.
---
### Author:  [@freakLS7](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/freakLS7)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2010, 3:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/63 "2010-03-27T15:56:30Z")
> [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/30441/8):
>
> You can get a clean C6Z for 38-40k with like 30kmi.
yeah check out CF quite a few on there!!!
---
### Author:  [@Boost\_Creep](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boost_Creep)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2010, 4:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/64 "2010-03-27T16:05:31Z")
It’s a raw car, been readin up. Can get a nice GTS for 37k
---
### Author:  [@Murrdog9000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Murrdog9000)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2010, 5:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/65 "2010-03-27T17:11:57Z")
you better watch out bryan… new mustang is gonna be walkin over your thoopra
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 4:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/66 "2010-03-28T16:53:15Z")
Journalists alternately lined up to drive both [cars](http://shift518.gom-host.com/#) trying different launch techniques, and when the dust settled, every scribe to a man (and woman) had a fistful of timeslips to prove that the Mustang was faster—and by a substantial margin. Yeah, even the Mexicans, who had no “horse” in the race. My best ET in the Camaro was an 8.82 at 83 mph—which turned out to be one of the best for the day. Not bad, but in the Mustang, I managed an 8.62 at 86 mph. In the theoretical quarter-mile—and given the traction limitations of the airport’s untreated surface (and no water and no burnouts allowed)—that’s roughly 13.80 for the Camaro and 13.50 for the Mustang. Other journalists faired similarly. But the plot thickens.
[http://blogs.popularhotrodding.com/6658872/hard-driving/2011-mustang-50/index.html](http://blogs.popularhotrodding.com/6658872/hard-driving/2011-mustang-50/index.html)
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 4:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/67 "2010-03-28T16:53:42Z")
And yes both those times are hella slow for what the should be :lol
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 5:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/68 "2010-03-28T17:43:00Z")
the times are a little off there adam ,esp seein as the lsx motors love the big end
---
### Author:  [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 5:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/69 "2010-03-28T17:49:38Z")
Fantasic, the new Camaro is slower than the old one, which had less power.
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 5:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/70 "2010-03-28T17:50:33Z")
but the new one is way heavier
---
### Author:  [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 5:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/71 "2010-03-28T17:55:12Z")
> [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/30488/33):
>
> but the new one is way heavier
True, but it sucks that the new one looks worse, and it slower.
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 5:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/72 "2010-03-28T17:56:31Z")
also true ,i like the car a lot butttttt it does have flaws . granted its only been out for a year or 2 now give it time
---
### Author:  [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 6:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/73 "2010-03-28T18:15:51Z")
> [@Stanley Cup](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stanley-cup/30019/84):
>
> also true ,i like the car a lot butttttt it does have flaws . granted its only been out for a year or 2 now give it time
Im just not feeling the looks man, but that’s personal pref. I also like the C5 interior more than the Supra interior, ha.
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 6:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/74 "2010-03-28T18:17:46Z")
i understand
---
### Author:  [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 6:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/75 "2010-03-28T18:26:50Z")
> [@layton108... a ten sec DSM? DSM guys](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/layton108-a-ten-sec-dsm-dsm-guys/30373/26):
>
> i understand
Did you still want that rubdown tonight, sugartits?
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2010, 6:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/76 "2010-03-28T18:28:29Z")
im ok for now , although adams gooch might be a bit sore . ill need it tommorow though ,i gotta replace /or fix a crack in my oil pan that somehow appeared
---
### Author:  [@Boost\_Creep](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boost_Creep)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2010, 5:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/77 "2010-03-29T05:52:59Z")
They really failed on the new Camaro…
---
### Author:  [@Wayne64SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Wayne64SS)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2010, 5:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/78 "2010-03-29T05:58:41Z")
5.0 FTMFW.
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2010, 1:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/79 "2010-03-29T13:26:14Z")
> **[2011 Ford Mustang GT Premium First Test - Motor Trend](http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/mustang/2011/2011-ford-mustang-gt-premium-test/)**
>
> The 2011 Ford Mustang GT is all those Mustang "5.0" owners who over the last five decades have felt a little embarrassed or deceitful it is time to rejoice. After a 16-year hiatus, the 5.0 has returned in the 2011 Mustang GT and, yes, at 4951cc, it...
[12.8@110](mailto:12.8@110) N/A with MT driving!!!
---
### Author:  [@Mike3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mike3)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2010, 1:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115/80 "2010-03-29T13:49:52Z")
I think I want one. I should see if they will take the z-plan on these or the a-plan whatever it’s called now, while grandma is still around.
[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115.md?page=3)
[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/brand-new-5-0-mustang-dyno/251115.md?page=5)