# Bullit mustang **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [November 12, 2007, 9:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bullit-mustang/38608 "2007-11-12T09:52:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2007, 11:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bullit-mustang/38608/17 "2007-11-13T11:10:43Z")
[quote=“LXTASY,post:15,topic:38608"”] I hear ya…but Ford should leave that in the past where it belongs, rather than try to bring it back (again now for the second time). It’s tarnishing the name and it’s history. But, we’ve seen this numerous times with Ford where they dwell too much on the past to resurrect something (take for example the new Taurus) when they should be focused on making something new and different. _Side note_ Ford was hiring out of my college (art/design school) when I graduated, yet refused to look at any students who took automotive design class. Instead they pulled students from product design classes to design their cars. They were also notorious for being diverse and hiring women and minorites _regardless of their talent base_. (In now way, shape, or form am I sexist or racist…all I care about is if you can get the job done). I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that that may be just a small part of the problem at Ford when it comes to their current product line. If it’s not obvious, I heavily dislike the direction Ford is currently heading in… [/quote] gotta love affirmative action. Hire based on race and gender opposed to skill --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bullit-mustang/38608)._