# bwahahah!!! Maxima 3, VW and 6cyl Stang - 1 **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [September 26, 2004, 9:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400 "2004-09-26T21:23:08Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 15\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [September 27, 2004, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/41 "2004-09-27T18:02:01Z")
> [@Darkstar](#): > > I beat stock 5.0’s in the Prelude. :kekegay: :bsflag: then again the pre 87’s were dogs 5 speed or auto :kekegay: ---
**Author:** ![DontH8V6](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ce73a5/32.png) [@DontH8V6](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DontH8V6)\ **Post date:** [October 1, 2004, 6:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/42 "2004-10-01T18:42:44Z")
SSsuperchargedE-I’ve read some of ur posts and u seem to really know what ur talking about. Perhaps ur in the minority here. Slowcamaro- > at the track i never seen one run faster than a 15.7…and i raced a few and never lost to one…i highly doubt they run faster than a v6 camaro > X2 Here it is, a stock 3.8 Camaro is faster than 3.8 Mustang-Granted production for the fbodies ceased in 02. Track ppl often mod their cars, so I’m sure that speaks even worse to v6 pony owners. Regardless, you can research the times urself by looking at R&T, C&D, and better mags that do this kind of testing. Here’s a great example using my year car of how the ponies don’t measure up. 1996 Mustang: Base Engine Size: 3.8 liters Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 150 hp Max Horsepower: 4000 rpm Torque: 215 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 2750 rpm Curb Weight: 3077 lbs. 1996 Camaro: Base Engine Size: 3.8 liters Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 200 hp Max Horsepower: 5200 rpm Torque: 225 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 4000 rpm 3306 lbs. ---
**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\ **Post date:** [October 1, 2004, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/43 "2004-10-01T20:09:19Z")
> [@DontH8V6](#): > > SSsuperchargedE-I’ve read some of ur posts and u seem to really know what ur talking about. Perhaps ur in the minority here. > > Slowcamaro- X2 > > Here it is, a stock 3.8 Camaro is faster than 3.8 Mustang-Granted production for the fbodies ceased in 02. Track ppl often mod their cars, so I’m sure that speaks even worse to v6 pony owners. Regardless, you can research the times urself by looking at R&T, C&D, and better mags that do this kind of testing. Here’s a great example using my year car of how the ponies don’t measure up. > > 1996 Mustang: > Base Engine Size: 3.8 liters > Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 150 hp > Max Horsepower: 4000 rpm Torque: 215 ft-lbs. > Max Torque: 2750 rpm > Curb Weight: 3077 lbs. > > 1996 Camaro: > Base Engine Size: 3.8 liters > Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 200 hp > Max Horsepower: 5200 rpm Torque: 225 ft-lbs. > Max Torque: 4000 rpm > 3306 lbs. compare an 02 vs 02 ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [October 1, 2004, 11:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/44 "2004-10-01T23:49:19Z")
> [@Blue4](#): > > compare an 02 vs 02 werd. My Maxima would have annihilated a 96 Mustang. 50 more hp same curb weight. I raced one of the newer ones, which have 190hp 220 tq. ---
**Author:** ![whitey](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/whitey/32/5911_2.png) [@whitey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/whitey)\ **Post date:** [October 1, 2004, 11:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/45 "2004-10-01T23:59:31Z")
> [@Darkstar](#): > > werd. My Maxima would have annihilated a 96 Mustang. 50 more hp same curb weight. I raced one of the newer ones, which have 190hp 220 tq. are you ready for me? ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 12:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/46 "2004-10-02T00:06:12Z")
> [@whitey](#): > > are you ready for me? :eek3: daily driver vs. daily driver! ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 1:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/47 "2004-10-02T01:28:59Z")
> [@DontH8V6](#): > > SSsuperchargedE-I’ve read some of ur posts and u seem to really know what ur talking about. Perhaps ur in the minority here. > > Slowcamaro- X2 > > Here it is, a stock 3.8 Camaro is faster than 3.8 Mustang-Granted production for the fbodies ceased in 02. Track ppl often mod their cars, so I’m sure that speaks even worse to v6 pony owners. Regardless, you can research the times urself by looking at R&T, C&D, and better mags that do this kind of testing. Here’s a great example using my year car of how the ponies don’t measure up. > > 1996 Mustang: > Base Engine Size: 3.8 liters > Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 150 hp > Max Horsepower: 4000 rpm Torque: 215 ft-lbs. > Max Torque: 2750 rpm > Curb Weight: 3077 lbs. > > 1996 Camaro: > Base Engine Size: 3.8 liters > Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 200 hp > Max Horsepower: 5200 rpm Torque: 225 ft-lbs. > Max Torque: 4000 rpm > 3306 lbs. your signature is horrible, Thank the heavens i have you on ignore now :blue: ---
**Author:** ![DontH8V6](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ce73a5/32.png) [@DontH8V6](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DontH8V6)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/48 "2004-10-02T17:22:01Z")
anyone feel free to compare an 02 fbody to an 02 stang for the v6ers. i’m not concerned ---
**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/49 "2004-10-02T17:24:47Z")
> [@DontH8V6](#): > > anyone feel free to compare an 02 fbody to an 02 stang for the v6ers. i’m not concerned I honestly could care less, the race could be timed with a sundial ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/50 "2004-10-02T17:26:25Z")
> [@DontH8V6](#): > > anyone feel free to compare an 02 fbody to an 02 stang for the v6ers. i’m not concerned I’d rather compare the 2003 Mustangs to the 2003 camaros :kekegay: ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/51 "2004-10-02T17:34:50Z")
> [@Shaggy](#): > > I’d rather compare the 2003 Mustangs to the 2003 camaros :kekegay: OMG!! hahaha that is so funny! Its funny because they didnt make a camaro in 2003! 🤣!!! you should compare it to a 1983 Corvette too!!! 🤣!!! :ugh: :love: ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/52 "2004-10-02T17:36:49Z")
> [@Darkstar](#): > > OMG!! hahaha that is so funny! Its funny because they didnt make a camaro in 2003! 🤣!!! > > you should compare it to a 1983 Corvette too!!! 🤣!!! > > :ugh: > > :love: :blue: 💏 ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/53 "2004-10-02T17:38:06Z")
> [@Shaggy](#): > > :blue: 💏 :69: ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 5:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/54 "2004-10-02T17:40:54Z")
> [@Darkstar](#): > > :69: ---
**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2004, 6:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400/55 "2004-10-02T18:53:43Z")
> [@Shaggy](#): > u would??? :greddy: [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bwahahah-maxima-3-vw-and-6cyl-stang-1/169400.md?page=2)