# By far the coolest thing I've hauled around so far

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [May 8, 2008, 4:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091 "2008-05-08T04:36:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 10:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/101 "2008-05-12T10:18:59Z")

</div>

> [@Viper966](#):
>
> i think that is for the typical 1 wheel front 2 in the rear configuration… your config is much more stable… while it probably cant “compete” im sure you can probably get a fun run in or 2…
> 
> i mean the thing doesnt tip does it?

I’m pretty sure if it can’t compete it can’t fun run. That would be an insurance nightmare if something were to happen.

\<— ex SCCA safety steward.

PM rushman to find out for sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![j\_espo1](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/j_espo1/32/7291_2.png) [@j\_espo1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/j_espo1)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 10:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/102 "2008-05-12T10:57:20Z")

</div>

> [@Quattro Krant](#):
>
> Now, I know NOTHING of sport bikes/fast bikes, etc etc so if this is a dumb question I’m sorry. But, would a stock Hayabusa or GSX-R or R1 be faster then the T-Rex? If they are it just puts in to perspective just how fast they are as this is pretty damn fast.

my guess is a liter bike would beat it. liter bike=less weight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 11:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/103 "2008-05-12T11:20:03Z")

</div>

A liter would destroy it… i doubt this thing would even be in modern 600 territory to be honest (as they are well into the 10s now)

That rear tire looks huge and putting down ~180 hp based on a zx-14 with all the extra weight… i think it would be a massacre (in favor of the sportbike)

Fun factor for 2 up riding, obviously goes to the trex though… comfort of a seat \> a bike.

0-60 in 3.5 is fast for a car, but for a bike, its quite easy to get to 60 in a little over 2 seconds…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 11:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/104 "2008-05-12T11:22:12Z")

</div>

> [@Willybeen](#):
>
> A liter would destroy it… i doubt this thing would even be in modern 600 territory to be honest (as they are well into the 10s now)
> 
> That rear tire looks huge and putting down ~180 hp based on a zx-14 with all the extra weight… i think it would be a massacre (in favor of the sportbike)
> 
> Fun factor for 2 up riding, obviously goes to the trex though… comfort of a seat \> a bike.
> 
> 0-60 in 3.5 is fast for a car, but for a bike, its quite easy to get to 60 in a little over 2 seconds…

It lives in that space where it’s hard to compare it’s performance figures to a car or a bike since isn’t about half and half.

Bottom line, it looks fun as hell. Still wondering if it’s going to Dunnville or if it would even be allowed on track.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quattro\_Krant](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/ac91a4/32.png) [@Quattro\_Krant](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quattro_Krant)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 11:26am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/105 "2008-05-12T11:26:44Z")

</div>

> [@Willybeen](#):
>
> A liter would destroy it… i doubt this thing would even be in modern 600 territory to be honest (as they are well into the 10s now)
> 
> That rear tire looks huge and putting down ~180 hp based on a zx-14 with all the extra weight… i think it would be a massacre (in favor of the sportbike)
> 
> Fun factor for 2 up riding, obviously goes to the trex though… comfort of a seat \> a bike.
> 
> 0-60 in 3.5 is fast for a car, but for a bike, its quite easy to get to 60 in a little over 2 seconds…

Thats so mind boggling to me. I had no idea good sport bikes were that fast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 11:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/106 "2008-05-12T11:30:25Z")

</div>

If you can stop it from wheelieing, its a non issue to get to 60 that quick… liter bikes esp.

figure that almost all new liter’s are ~400 lbs… and put down about 160 whp… sub 10 sec 1/4 at around 145 mph… roll on 60-80 and 80-100 are in the the 2sec range… (without shifting out of 6th) :lol:

Bikes are silly

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Onyx\_Z32](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/onyx_z32/32/7581_2.png) [@Onyx\_Z32](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Onyx_Z32)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 12:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/107 "2008-05-12T12:31:32Z")

</div>

> [@JayS](#):
>
> … Still wondering if it’s going to Dunnville or if it would even be allowed on track.

Well it was going to be a surprise on the 24th, but the cat’s outa the bag now. If it’s not raining, Josh said he’d bring it. And yes, it’s allowed on track :tup:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 12:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/108 "2008-05-12T12:49:08Z")

</div>

> [@Onyx Z32](#):
>
> Well it was going to be a surprise on the 24th, but the cat’s outa the bag now. If it’s not raining, Josh said he’d bring it. And yes, it’s allowed on track :tup:

Very nice. Wish I wasn’t going to be out of town that weekend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![j\_espo1](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/j_espo1/32/7291_2.png) [@j\_espo1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/j_espo1)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 3:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/109 "2008-05-12T15:18:28Z")

</div>

> [@Willybeen](#):
>
> If you can stop it from wheelieing, its a non issue to get to 60 that quick… liter bikes esp.
> 
> figure that almost all new liter’s are ~400 lbs… and put down about 160 whp… sub 10 sec 1/4 at around 145 mph… roll on 60-80 and 80-100 are in the the 2sec range… (without shifting out of 6th) :lol:
> 
> Bikes are silly

when are you heading out to 1/4 mile track? i want to go and see what i can do. pm me

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dex](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/dex/32/7210_2.png) [@Dex](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dex)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2008, 6:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/110 "2008-05-12T18:58:55Z")

</div>

i’d heard rumors about this. that is mind blowingly cool. congrats on it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quattro\_Krant](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/ac91a4/32.png) [@Quattro\_Krant](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quattro_Krant)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2008, 10:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/111 "2008-05-13T10:06:00Z")

</div>

> [@Willybeen](#):
>
> If you can stop it from wheelieing, its a non issue to get to 60 that quick… liter bikes esp.
> 
> figure that almost all new liter’s are ~400 lbs… and put down about 160 whp… sub 10 sec 1/4 at around 145 mph… roll on 60-80 and 80-100 are in the the 2sec range… (without shifting out of 6th) :lol:
> 
> Bikes are silly

Thats NUTS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K.A.T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ba8739/32.png) [@K.A.T](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K.A.T)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2008, 7:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/112 "2008-05-13T19:31:50Z")

</div>

> [@Willybeen](#):
>
> figure that almost all new liter’s are ~400 lbs… and put down about 160

They are all pretty equal …some have a bit more horses but less weigh and vise versa …  
  
**Engine:** 999cc Four-cylinder, DOHC, 16-valve  
**Horsepower:** 157.6 hp @ 12,100 rpm  
**Torque:** 75.34 lb-ft @ 10,000 rpm  
**Weight:** 473 lbs w/fuel - 445.4 lbs w/o fuel  
**Power to Weight Ratio:** 0.33 hp per lbs.  
**Wheelbase:** 55.7-in.  
**Seat Height:** 31.9-in.  
**Measured MPG:** 33.02  
**MSRP:** $11,499  
  
**Engine:** In-Line Four cylinder, 16-valve  
**Bore x Stroke:** 76 x 55mm  
**Horsepower:** 158.73 @ 12,300 rpm  
**Torque:** 74.37 @ 9000 rpm  
**Weight: w/ Fuel:** 463 lbs - w/o Fuel: 436 lbs (4.5 gal)  
**Power to Weight Ratio:** 0.34 hp per lbs.  
**Rake & Trail:** 25.5 x 109.2mm  
**Wheelbase:** 55.7-in.  
**Seat Height:** 32.7-in.  
**Measured MPG:** 31.13 mpg  
**MSRP:** $11,549  
  
**Engine:** 999cc In-Line Four cylinder, 16-valve  
**Bore x Stroke:** 76 x 55.1mm  
**Horsepower:** 153.4 @ 10,700 rpm  
**Torque:** 78.74 @ 9400 rpm  
**Weight:** 439 lbs w/ Fuel - 410.8 lbs w/o Fuel (4.7 gal)  
**Power to Weight Ratio:** 0.35 hp per lbs.  
**Rake & Trail:** 23.3 x 96.2mm  
**Wheelbase:** 55.4-in.  
**Seat Height:** 32.3-in.  
**Measured MPG:** 35.5-mpg  
**MSRP:** $11,599  
  
**ngine:** 998cc inline 4-cylinder, DOHC, 16 valve  
**Bore x Stroke:** 77 x 53.6mm  
**Horsepower:** 150.31 @ 12,200  
**Torque:** 73.64 @ 9500  
**Weight:** 464 lbs w/ fuel - 435.8 lbs w/o fuel  
**Power to Weight Ratio:** 0.32 hp per lbs.  
**Rake & Trail:** 24-degree x 101.6mm  
**Wheelbase:** 55.7-in.  
**Seat Height:** 32.9-in.  
**Measured MPG:** 31.6 mpg  
**MSRP:** $11,699  
  
**Engine:** 1099cc L-Twin, Desmodromic, 8-valves  
**Bore x Stroke:** 104mm x 64.7mm  
**Horsepower:** 139 hp @ 9600 rpm  
**Torque:** 82.60 lb.ft @ 7800 rpm  
**Weight:** 435 lbs w/fuel - 410.5 lbs w/o fuel  
**Power to Weight Ratio:** 0.32 hp per lbs  
**Wheelbase:** 56.3-in.  
**Seat Height:** 32.2-in.  
**Measured MPG:** 34 mpg  
**MSRP:** $15,995

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2008, 8:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/113 "2008-05-13T20:40:18Z")

</div>

where did you find those specs?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K.A.T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ba8739/32.png) [@K.A.T](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K.A.T)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2008, 8:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/114 "2008-05-13T20:53:12Z")

</div>

> [@Carnut](#):
>
> where did you find those specs?

another forum

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2008, 8:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/115 "2008-05-13T20:55:45Z")

</div>

do they have specs on the hayabusa?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2008, 11:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/116 "2008-05-13T23:53:40Z")

</div>

I ATE A HAYABUSA TONIGHT ON THE 10R… every gear… oasis can vouch 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kramer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/97f17d/32.png) [@Kramer](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Kramer)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2008, 12:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/117 "2008-05-14T00:17:26Z")

</div>

> [@Willybeen](#):
>
> I ATE A HAYABUSA TONIGHT ON THE 10R… every gear… oasis can vouch 🙂

verrry nice

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2008, 12:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/118 "2008-05-14T00:41:51Z")

</div>

I never did get the Bandwagon of the hayabusa and zx-14… seriously the only thing they offer over a liter bike is comfort (which is that great), weight (so they dont wheelie as easy), and lastly top speed (which to me, 160 is plenty fast, and if I cant trap it in the 1/4 mile, its unnecessary when we’re talking about racing)…

Josh, let me know if you ever decide to take it to the drag strip. Id love to see it run

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2008, 12:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/119 "2008-05-14T00:45:07Z")

</div>

My guess is it would turn a mid to high 12 on a decent run with a novice rider. Id imagine at best it would be a low 12, MAYBE… maybe a high 11… (which has to feel damn fast from a seated position)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2008, 12:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091/120 "2008-05-14T00:48:41Z")

</div>

> [@Carnut](#):
>
> do they have specs on the hayabusa?

GSX1300R Hayabusa ('05)

Horse Power  
162.6 @ 9750  
TQ = 97.4 @ 7000 Wet Weight 563 Dry Weight  
533

\

all from  
[http://www.sportrider.com/tech/146\_weights\_measurements/index.html#suzuki](http://www.sportrider.com/tech/146_weights_measurements/index.html#suzuki)

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/by-far-the-coolest-thing-ive-hauled-around-so-far/48091.md?page=7)
