# C6Z vs KB GT500

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [December 9, 2007, 8:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982 "2007-12-09T08:28:06Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Violator](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/violator/32/7278_2.png) [@Violator](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Violator)
#### Post date: [December 18, 2007, 1:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/21 "2007-12-18T13:02:41Z")

</div>

> [@jt76](#):
>
> I would never buy a GT500. Way over priced and Ford should have put the thing on a diet but, Im not a fan of the new mustang at all really. If i was to buy another car though it would be a 2003-2004 Cobra for sure. Vettes really arnt my thing eiether.

Exactly what Im thinking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Xander](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/xander/32/7597_2.png) [@Xander](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Xander)
#### Post date: [December 18, 2007, 2:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/22 "2007-12-18T14:23:23Z")

</div>

> [@Haenszel](#):
>
> z06 “500hp” = 6.35 lb/hp  
> gt500 “640hp” = 6.125 lb/hp

The Z06 has more power than they claim then. :gotme:

X…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bladez](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bladez/32/7237_2.png) [@bladez](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bladez)
#### Post date: [December 18, 2007, 2:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/23 "2007-12-18T14:28:19Z")

</div>

better aerodynamics too, the front of the gt500 is like a semi, lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![budsdubbin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/d2c977/32.png) [@budsdubbin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/budsdubbin)
#### Post date: [December 18, 2007, 7:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/24 "2007-12-18T19:39:54Z")

</div>

> [@turbo ls1 ss"](#):
>
> this is pretty cool…lol
> 
> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsoN157-M00](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsoN157-M00)
> 
> 500rwhp zo6 vs 640rwhp shelby. who wins?..
> 
> im starting to sway away towards the C5Z towards the C6’s. was looking at the new LS3 C6’s yesterday… 🙂 :pimp:

wow gotta get some water/meth on that shelby, to bad the shelby weights like twice as much as the zo6

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Oroc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/c68b51/32.png) [@Oroc](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Oroc)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 8:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/25 "2007-12-19T08:10:00Z")

</div>

> [@bladez](#):
>
> yea, why would you run 12 psi on a kb :gotme:
> 
> especially a kb that big, the 2.8’s don’t hit their efficiency range until 20+ psi…

huh huh time to come to the darkside fag!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![1BADGPGT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/1badgpgt/32/5123_2.png) [@1BADGPGT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/1BADGPGT)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 1:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/26 "2007-12-19T13:35:44Z")

</div>

Ditch those damn low profiles too. :lolham::headbang: I know the low proz and sweet rims get da bitchez but some tall wall sticky ickys get da tractionz…and wheeliez

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Deathproof](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/dec6dc/32.png) [@Deathproof](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Deathproof)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2008, 7:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/27 "2008-04-02T19:00:22Z")

</div>

No matter what you say about the GT500, c16, a big twin screw or turbo and alot of boost will have no problem making 1000rwhp on the stock short block…

oh and it will last.

SOLID REAR AXLE FTW, when it’s a straight line car, which the GT500 is of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bladez](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bladez/32/7237_2.png) [@bladez](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bladez)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2008, 7:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/28 "2008-04-02T19:30:13Z")

</div>

it will last, but not very long

and on a twin screw alone may be close, even for a 3.4 whipple that is a lot of power to make on a twin screw alone. probably would need a shot of the sauce to make 1000rwhp on a screw blower

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![1BADGPGT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/1badgpgt/32/5123_2.png) [@1BADGPGT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/1BADGPGT)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2008, 7:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/29 "2008-04-02T19:56:19Z")

</div>

What are “stock” GT500s running in the 1/4mi. on average? I hear 12.8 down to 12.0 NO MODS AT ALL. Does that sound correct?

…and who puts meth/water injection on a roots or twin screw blower??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![98GCL](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/98gcl/32/7366_2.png) [@98GCL](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/98GCL)
#### Post date: [April 3, 2008, 6:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982/30 "2008-04-03T06:24:55Z")

</div>

would be nice to see from a stop if the Shelby had some Slicks.

In a 5.0 mag I got awhile back a GT500 ran low 11s with MT DRs, headers, pulley, exhaust, intake, and tune. I think it was puttin down 550ish rwhp.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/c6z-vs-kb-gt500/39982.md?page=1)
