# Cam Question **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [March 5, 2006, 6:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794 "2006-03-05T18:39:48Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![85StangGT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/8/278dde/32.png) [@85StangGT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/85StangGT)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2006, 6:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794/1 "2006-03-05T18:39:48Z")
Ive been cam shoppin for a while and still can’t make up my mind. its goin in the stang(mods in sig) but im not sure if the lift is too big. Its the Ford racing f-303 cam. specs below Brand: Ford Racing Performance Parts Product Line: Ford Racing Camshafts Cam Style: Hydraulic roller tappet Intake Duration at 050 inch LiftVL: 226 Exhaust Duration at 050 inch LiftVL: 226 Duration at 050 inch Lift: 226 int./226 exh. Advertised Intake DurationVL: 288 Advertised Exhaust DurationVL: 288 Advertised Duration: 288 int./288 exh. Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm RatioVL: 0.512 in. Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm RatioVL: 0.512 in. Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.512 int./0.512 exh. lift Lobe Separation (degrees)VL: 109 Intake Valve Lash (in)VL: 0.000 in. Exhaust Valve Lash (in)VL: 0.000 in. Computer Controlled Compatible: No Grind Number: M-6250-F303 im debating between this and the e-303 but ive heard the f-303 in a stang and it sounds bad ass! in the near future i plan to add nitrous so i dunno if that would be a factor. If anyone has any suggestions on this cam or if they have any other recommendations i would greatly appreciate it. ---
**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2006, 6:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794/2 "2006-03-05T18:42:05Z")
hahah jeeeeeeeeves(aka) quik is :ban:,he’ll will answer tomorrow after 4pm:kekegay: ---
**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2006, 6:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794/3 "2006-03-05T18:43:21Z")
what heads?stock head f cams are poooooooooooopo ---
**Author:** ![85StangGT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/8/278dde/32.png) [@85StangGT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/85StangGT)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2006, 7:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794/4 "2006-03-05T19:00:07Z")
the heads are stock w/ the exception of a 3 angle valve job ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2006, 7:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794/5 "2006-03-05T19:13:16Z")
I have a Steeda #18 for sale. Specifications: - Lift .480 w/1.6 Rockers - Duration 220° @ 0.050 intake - Duration 226° @ 0.050 exhaust - Lobe Separation 112° $120 [http://www.steeda.com/store/-catalog/steeda18cam.htm](http://www.steeda.com/store/-catalog/steeda18cam.htm) ---
**Author:** ![Swarzkopf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7feea3/32.png) [@Swarzkopf](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Swarzkopf)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2006, 4:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cam-question/180794/6 "2006-03-06T04:34:50Z")
> what heads?stock head f cams are poooooooooooopo Yeah… Shaggy’s cam wouldn’t be _bad_ for what you’re wanting. The F-cam would be absurd to run with stock E7s. Quite honestly, I wouldn’t slap a cam into a 5.0 wearing stock heads. An aftermarket cam will really take advantage of the new flow potential of a good set of aftermarket heads; while providing minimal gains on stockers. I don’t pretend to be a valvetrain expert. You should post this at Stangnet/Corral and let the cam gurus give your more/better information.