# Camaro RS/SS vs. Mustang GT vs. Challenger R/T

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [March 23, 2009, 5:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016 "2009-03-23T17:47:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 5:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/1 "2009-03-23T17:47:16Z")

</div>

Pretty cool. Mustang did alot better than i expected, and was down by +/- 100hp!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 5:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/2 "2009-03-23T17:55:37Z")

</div>

nice video. The Camaro kills them on the top end. 111 traps bone stock isnt bad at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 5:57pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/3 "2009-03-23T17:57:04Z")

</div>

so the RS/SS is the “base” V8 car and the Z28 is the big dog?

ill take a GT500 is white please. thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/4 "2009-03-23T18:01:38Z")

</div>

> [@SSmokinn SS"](#):
>
> nice video. The Camaro kills them on the top end. 111 traps bone stock isnt bad at all.

110 bitch:tongue :lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/5 "2009-03-23T18:02:44Z")

</div>

> [@Everything is almost ready...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/everything-is-almost-ready/15990/38):
>
> 110 bitch:tongue :lol

its like his 109.x = 111

a stock SS will run low 12s, dont forget that

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/6 "2009-03-23T18:07:06Z")

</div>

> [@FS: 2 CARS '00 Lexus RX300 & '03 Lancer Evolution](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2-cars-00-lexus-rx300-03-lancer-evolution/12573/34):
>
> its like his 109.x = 111
> 
> a stock SS will run low 12s, dont forget that

what?? I trapped 110.98 which is why I said 111…I didnt trap 109 and say 111. Why do you seem to always start shit?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/7 "2009-03-23T18:09:19Z")

</div>

This aint suposed to be a flame thread lol…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/8 "2009-03-23T18:13:37Z")

</div>

> [@car question (turbo honda)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/car-question-turbo-honda/16030/21):
>
> what?? I trapped 110.98 which is why I said 111…I didnt trap 109 and say 111. Why do you seem to always start shit?

prove it!!! :ahh

why do you always get so defensive :lol

but i definently saw a 109 run that night. dont recall any 110s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K20power](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/41988e/32.png) [@K20power](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K20power)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/9 "2009-03-23T18:19:14Z")

</div>

Damn is the new Mustang rear end ugly as shit.  
Challenger has them all in the looks department though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/10 "2009-03-23T18:19:30Z")

</div>

> [@Mk4 30R"](#):
>
> prove it!!! :ahh
> 
> why do you always get so defensive :lol
> 
> but i definently saw a 109 run that night. dont recall any 110s.

my first run of the night was 109. I bounced off the rev limiter on the 1-2 shift a few times

all my other runs were in the 110 range between 110.5 and 110.9

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/11 "2009-03-23T18:20:38Z")

</div>

> [@Moving Truck???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/moving-truck/16017/47):
>
> Damn is the new Mustang rear end ugly as shit.  
> Challenger has them all in the looks department though.

I think the mustang looks sick and the challenger is the ugliest…im my eyes the Camaro and mustang looks sick. Challenger looks way too big…even tho the camaro is still a big car, it doesnt look nearly as big as the challenger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/12 "2009-03-23T18:20:57Z")

</div>

> [@TEAM FMF - CALL OUT 0-1320'](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/team-fmf-call-out-0-1320/15368/155):
>
> my first run of the night was 109. I bounced off the rev limiter on the 1-2 shift a few times
> 
> all my other runs were in the 110 range between 110.5 and 110.9

you needs moser 9inch or 12bolt and some real tires.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/13 "2009-03-23T18:21:15Z")

</div>

Challenger=too much $$$

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/14 "2009-03-23T18:22:50Z")

</div>

> [@FS: SINGLE LAYER FIRE SUIT](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-single-layer-fire-suit/16043/7):
>
> you needs moser 9inch or 12bolt and some real tires.

I almost bought one but had to buy a stupid flat screen tv and shit for the apartment

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/15 "2009-03-23T18:23:07Z")

</div>

> [@8/20 Autocross @ Seneca Army Depot](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/8-20-autocross-seneca-army-depot/16034/5):
>
> Challenger=too much $$$

I agree. Too much money for not enough performance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/16 "2009-03-23T18:24:45Z")

</div>

> [@New to THIS board = )](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-to-this-board/16049/5):
>
> I almost bought one but had to buy a stupid flat screen tv and shit for the apartment

no way, tv’s are overated. i could have given you one from my chevrolet movie theater

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 6:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-rs-ss-vs-mustang-gt-vs-challenger-r-t/243016/17 "2009-03-23T18:44:27Z")

</div>

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnMDrv8Mx3E](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnMDrv8Mx3E) :excited
