# Camaro vs Mustang facepalm thread (split) **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [January 21, 2011, 2:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-vs-mustang-facepalm-thread-split/256550 "2011-01-21T14:08:46Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 39
**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\ **Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 2:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-vs-mustang-facepalm-thread-split/256550/39 "2011-01-21T14:50:21Z")
> [@ever heard of a low potassium problem??](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ever-heard-of-a-low-potassium-problem/38974/2): > > 4.6 single cam has terrible modification potential, its damn near impossible to keep one streetable and make 400whp N/A. And even with FI the motor cant handle anymore then 425-450whp. They arent mod friendly at all compared to LSx powered vehicles. my point exactly… I made 412rwhp with long tubes and a cam…I would LOVE to see the 4.6 do that… --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/camaro-vs-mustang-facepalm-thread-split/256550)._