# car enthusiasts 1  pelosi 0

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/car-enthusiasts-1-pelosi-0/201912>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 18, 2009, 10:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/car-enthusiasts-1-pelosi-0/201912 "2009-02-18T10:54:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jeff95TA](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jeff95ta/32/5935_2.png) [@Jeff95TA](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jeff95TA)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 11:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/car-enthusiasts-1-pelosi-0/201912/5 "2009-02-18T11:51:06Z")

</div>

> [@Real or fake? Pics soon...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/real-or-fake-pics-soon/39637/24):
>
> so wait, they were going to go around and take ppl’s cars that they thought were inefficent and make them buy new ones?

I’m guessing it would have been some type of tax incentive. I don’t think (hope) they could actually force you to scrap your car and buy a new one.

Wouldn’t it be greener to just limit people to having 1 kid? Over a lifetime, 1 “carbon footprint” vs. 3 would more than make up for a fuel inefficient vehicle. I don’t think the Vatican would back it though. 😃

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/car-enthusiasts-1-pelosi-0/201912)._
