# Considering busting out the lemon law

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/considering-busting-out-the-lemon-law/204541>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [January 27, 2010, 2:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/considering-busting-out-the-lemon-law/204541 "2010-01-27T14:30:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![integrrac](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/bcef8e/32.png) [@integrrac](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/integrrac)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2010, 9:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/considering-busting-out-the-lemon-law/204541/12 "2010-01-28T09:10:10Z")

</div>

> [@local jdm hotness!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/local-jdm-hotness/41962/6):
>
> So what if there is a 2005 subaru baja turbo that has had 2 blown turbos since it was bought new and may need a 3rd new turbo? Will it qualify under the lemon law?

If the first blown turbo was before you had the car for 12 months or 12k miles! If you have documentation that the first issue was within that window I think your covered, at least that’s the way i read it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/considering-busting-out-the-lemon-law/204541)._