# Consumer Reports 10 Worst Cars

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/consumer-reports-10-worst-cars/44719>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 10, 2008, 7:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/consumer-reports-10-worst-cars/44719 "2008-03-10T07:01:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cavi\_Mike](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/cavi_mike/32/5217_2.png) [@Cavi\_Mike](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Cavi_Mike)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2008, 9:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/consumer-reports-10-worst-cars/44719/11 "2008-03-10T09:25:20Z")

</div>

They were probably based on safety, ergonomics, build quality and reliability. As much as people like to believe SUV’s are safe, they are not. The H2 or H3 actually scored one of the worst frontal crash ratings of all new vehicles. Don’t know what the ergonomics on most American cars are like but I know they don’t hold a candle to ze Germans or Japan. Build quality? Heh. Should I even go there? How about reliability? Yeah right. Total Recall has a whole new meaning.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/consumer-reports-10-worst-cars/44719)._