# Cops and The Consequences

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cops-and-the-consequences/112625>\
**Category:** SON240sx Automotive\
**Created:** [January 21, 2008, 11:52pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cops-and-the-consequences/112625 "2008-01-21T23:52:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![renman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ecb155/32.png) [@renman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/renman)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2008, 5:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cops-and-the-consequences/112625/22 "2008-01-24T05:19:03Z")

</div>

> [@New Episode of Cribs](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-episode-of-cribs/15641/3):
>
> I had almost forgotten about that, a valid point…
> 
> But indeed no real excuse when you consider the profits, they’re clearly WAY too far on the safe side in terms of collecting premiums.
> 
> But as you said…ins. co’s are crazy! 😃

+1 on all your points. That’s why I’m in favour of government insurance i.e. BC in theory, because profits should not be a driver of rates. Which I think it currently is.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cops-and-the-consequences/112625)._