# Crysis

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/crysis/51036
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [July 4, 2008, 4:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/crysis/51036 "2008-07-04T04:06:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ZOMGVTEK](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zomgvtek/32/5063_2.png) [@ZOMGVTEK](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ZOMGVTEK)
#### Post date: [July 4, 2008, 9:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/crysis/51036/8 "2008-07-04T21:09:58Z")

</div>

> [@Djs87](#):
>
> wrong. dual 8800 gts (g92) overclocked to 775 core 1850 shader 2200 memory w/ my 1680x1050 22’’ or my 42’’ 1920x1080 tv. Obviously my frames are a bit better on the 22’’ monitor but the tv is fun sometimes. frames for both hover around 30-40 fps. obviously some parts youll hit 20s which is really pushing it. but 30-40 is very playable, and it looks great. About a month ago a new set of drivers came out that REALLY helped add fps to the 8 series cards for crysis. In dx10 mode I saw about 10fps better with the 175.16 drivers. However, as nice as my pc is for gaming, as soon as I think about adding AA to the visuals in crysis(even a small x2) it quickly becomes unplayable, at higher resolutions.
> 
> Also…tri sli wont show benefits until you start hitting resolutions higher than 1920x1080. Also…huge waste of $. 2 video cards is more than enough for just about anybody.

I only have a single 8800GTS G92 at 850/2300/1285-DDR, and i dont find my frames playable at ALL at 1360x768, all settings at high 16xQAA, DX9. Im hitting mid 50’s average, and thats quite poor. It dips down to 30’s or lower sometimes too. With modded very high settings, i get 30’s averge FPS on the stock crysis timedemo.

And I’m well aware of tri-sli scaling.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/crysis/51036)._