# Cute Starter Evo X World Record **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [February 18, 2013, 7:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cute-starter-evo-x-world-record/266274 "2013-02-18T19:39:21Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![pitman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4da419/32.png) [@pitman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/pitman)\ **Post date:** [February 19, 2013, 11:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cute-starter-evo-x-world-record/266274/3 "2013-02-19T11:21:53Z")
> [@The Dark Knight Movie](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-dark-knight-movie/51395/80): > > This guy just broke the evo x world record the other day with 908hp. 6466 turbo on E85. The impressive part of this is he is still on a built 2.0… would be curious to see this on a 2.2-2.4L. > [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C\_hqVkix6Xo](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_hqVkix6Xo) does more cubic inches mean more power? or are there alot of other things to consider? i know for most motors its a give and take. some benefit from more rpm others benefit from displacement. just because one has bigger motor doesnt mean more power. there are so many things that add up to hp. cubic inches can add hp but it can subtract too. if he is going for peak hp the smaller motor might be better. i am sure the builders of this considered a 2.4 but went with a 2.0 for a reason. it doesnt lok like $$$ was the decideing factor also i hate the record numbers. i can drop that same car on a different dyno with same tune and my dyno readout will show more hp. so i could break his record if all it takes is a sheet to have the record. any dyno expert will tell you the same thing. i like measuring a cars d by racing not a dyno sheet. good video and nice record breaker on the dyno. i just felt the need to ramble a bit. and i would like to here your opnion on why you would want to see it on a 2.4l --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/cute-starter-evo-x-world-record/266274)._