# Discussion on the new Civic **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [July 11, 2007, 8:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/discussion-on-the-new-civic/191087 "2007-07-11T08:30:59Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 51
**Author:** ![Habib88](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/habib88/32/3341_2.png) [@Habib88](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Habib88)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2007, 2:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/discussion-on-the-new-civic/191087/51 "2007-07-22T14:30:09Z")
> [@FS: 2006 Suzuki GS 500F (THINK MPG)\_SOLD](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2006-suzuki-gs-500f-think-mpg-sold/31482/9): > > i think that honda is going to have to go with a factory turbo because even though theyre great cars, in the tuner scene they arent doing well at all competing with wrx’s and evo’s. yeah the k20 is an amazing motor and a great improvement but it still cant really compete with awd turbo. Why would you compare the civic to the EVO? Two totally different cars and two totally different price ranges. You really think people in the tuner scene would buy a Si if they could afford a EVO? Ok maybe some could afford the EVO and instead buy the Si for whatever reasons. As for the WRX, if your talking about the STi that falls in with the EVO arguement. For a regular WRX thats more like the Si’s territory. After racing in both cars for autox, I’d rather be in the Si for a host of reasons. If I was buying one for drag racing then I’d probably consider the WRX a bit more. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/discussion-on-the-new-civic/191087)._