# Displacement on Demand

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 28, 2005, 2:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829 "2005-09-28T14:36:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Daddie](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/daddie/32/7621_2.png) [@Daddie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Daddie)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 2:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/1 "2005-09-28T14:36:09Z")

</div>

And such systems like that…

wouldn’t a cylinder not firing (or 4) put a VERY large amount of stress on the crank?

Or am I just not understanding how it works?

My thoughts : 8 cylinders firing.

You now coast.

4 cylinders shut off. IE. vavles open and close but no fuel is let in and spark plug doesn’t fire.

I think that’s the general jist of it, can someone elaborate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbleSparkxx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a87d85/32.png) [@BubbleSparkxx](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BubbleSparkxx)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 2:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/2 "2005-09-28T14:43:20Z")

</div>

i always wondered what the real world fuel economy is for vehicles that utilize this technology - like the new Hemis for example…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anonymity](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/anonymity/32/7215_2.png) [@Anonymity](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Anonymity)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/3 "2005-09-28T15:33:58Z")

</div>

no more then with all 8 running, balance is key. that tech is going to be happening more and more. i was just talking aboiut this at work. soon ka’z will have 2 engines. One “pony” motor for mpgz and "hall ass’ motor.

my thought

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Denton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Denton](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Denton)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/4 "2005-09-28T15:38:29Z")

</div>

> [@Daddie](#):
>
> I think that’s the general jist of it, can someone elaborate?

[http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html](http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html)

Scroll down to where it says “Displacement on demand”

very different from the old caddy 4-6-8

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedGoober4Life](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redgoober4life/32/7610_2.png) [@RedGoober4Life](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedGoober4Life)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/5 "2005-09-28T15:40:57Z")

</div>

> [@fastandcheap](#):
>
> no more then with all 8 running, balance is key. that tech is going to be happening more and more. i was just talking aboiut this at work. soon ka’z will have 2 engines. One “pony” motor for mpgz and "hall ass’ motor.
> 
> my thought

This would be fairly inefficient.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![halas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/898d66/32.png) [@halas](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/halas)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 6:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/6 "2005-09-28T18:28:21Z")

</div>

The only stress is the weight of the piston/rod assembly, minimal compression resistance, and the friction involved with it going up/down in the sleeve and any pin/bearing related frictional loses. With DOD the oil passages for the deactivated cylinder is blocked off by a soleniod thus collapsing the hydraulic lifters and eliminating the valves from opening. This basically leaves the cylinder with little air in it and you get a yo-yo effect from the air compressing/expanding. I certain the crank experiences stresses that are 1000X greater during the normal combustion cycle so having half shutdown is minimal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![King](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/king/32/7329_2.png) [@King](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/King)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 6:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/7 "2005-09-28T18:33:37Z")

</div>

> [@fastandcheap](#):
>
> no more then with all 8 running, balance is key. that tech is going to be happening more and more. i was just talking aboiut this at work. soon ka’z will have 2 engines. One “pony” motor for mpgz and "hall ass’ motor.
> 
> my thought

:gotme: can u supercharge the pony?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AKA-FERRARI](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/aka-ferrari/32/7260_2.png) [@AKA-FERRARI](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/AKA-FERRARI)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 7:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/8 "2005-09-28T19:15:59Z")

</div>

> [@halas](#):
>
> The only stress is the weight of the piston/rod assembly, minimal compression resistance, and the friction involved with it going up/down in the sleeve and any pin/bearing related frictional loses. With DOD the oil passages for the deactivated cylinder is blocked off by a soleniod thus collapsing the hydraulic lifters and eliminating the valves from opening. This basically leaves the cylinder with little air in it and you get a yo-yo effect from the air compressing/expanding. I certain the crank experiences stresses that are 1000X greater during the normal combustion cycle so having half shutdown is minimal.

halas can sum it up best, for gods sake he’s a gm engineer

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dozr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/41988e/32.png) [@dozr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dozr)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 8:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/9 "2005-09-28T20:35:29Z")

</div>

I always wondered if they could do this with the ferrari/lambo style engines where each bank of cylinders operates as a seperate engine connected to the same crank (at least thats the way I understand it). Like if one whole side could be shut down until needed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_ls1_ss/32/7303_2.png) [@turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turbo_ls1_ss)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 8:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/10 "2005-09-28T20:36:11Z")

</div>

didnt work back in the day with caddies, wont work now

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![16vCorvette](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/1/b487fb/32.png) [@16vCorvette](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/16vCorvette)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 8:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/11 "2005-09-28T20:56:40Z")

</div>

> [@turbo ls1 ss](#):
>
> didnt work back in the day with caddies, wont work now

Why won’t it work now? Back than wasn’t it a primitive electronic fuel injection? Like an 8 bit processor. Now the ECU is much more powerful, and able to calculate what it takes to activate/deactivate a bank of cylinders.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![STEALTTH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/stealtth/32/7582_2.png) [@STEALTTH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/STEALTTH)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 10:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/12 "2005-09-28T22:13:15Z")

</div>

this is true…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_ls1_ss/32/7303_2.png) [@turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turbo_ls1_ss)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 10:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/13 "2005-09-28T22:15:24Z")

</div>

> [@16vCorvette](#):
>
> Why won’t it work now? Back than wasn’t it a primitive electronic fuel injection? Like an 8 bit processor. Now the ECU is much more powerful, and able to calculate what it takes to activate/deactivate a bank of cylinders.

idk, just felt like bein an ass

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nikuk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/nikuk/32/7254_2.png) [@Nikuk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Nikuk)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2005, 1:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/14 "2005-09-29T13:44:21Z")

</div>

^ :roll2:

My understanding is similar to Halas’ post above. It has evolved along way since introduction and will be making it’s wayinto more applications.

I didn’t know that closing off the lifters was how it was done tho… wow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chino](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/bcef8e/32.png) [@chino](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/chino)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2005, 1:57pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/displacement-on-demand/2829/15 "2005-09-29T13:57:30Z")

</div>

or they could just use small 4 bangers with vtec and terblows 😃

i keed i keed, dod and further advances in this technology are sweet :tup:
