# DO WANT **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [October 31, 2010, 1:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/do-want/255334 "2010-10-31T13:15:03Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 44
**Author:** ![LS\_WS.6](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ls_ws.6/32/6563_2.png) [@LS\_WS.6](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LS_WS.6)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2010, 6:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/do-want/255334/44 "2010-11-02T06:51:25Z")
> [@Who drives a Subaru with Plate# SNKYSNKY](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/who-drives-a-subaru-with-plate-snkysnky/36793/222): > > i wish the “retro look” trend would die off and american car makers would find some engineers and deisgners with some creativity. what ever happened to coming up with a breath taking design like they did in the 50’s-early 70’s. stupid retro look… hey guys look at me, i suck and cant think of something good, so ill just round the edges a bit and call it new. > > the best thing coming from the american car makers in the last 5 years is the C6 vette. > > America does engines well, thats about it. > > the only car that hasnt changed much from its original design, and still pulls it off without a hitch is the Porsche 911. agree, all fords including gt and the camaros are all fail to me cause they are taking a 30 yr old blue print and making square areas round and they are done. im only defending this “trans am” because its not a gm produced car, just a car made by a aftermarket company to please certain wealthy trans am lovers. but yes you r correct. porsche 911, yes it works for them but still am sick of not being able to tell a early 1900’s 911 from a 2011 911:lol --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/do-want/255334)._