# Don't die, Jaguar

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dont-die-jaguar/12874>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [June 3, 2006, 11:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dont-die-jaguar/12874 "2006-06-03T23:28:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 45

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowracer101](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@snowracer101](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/snowracer101)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2006, 1:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dont-die-jaguar/12874/45 "2006-06-05T13:46:12Z")

</div>

yes, but if it was the same…wouldnt the x-type be more FWD biased instd of RWD biased? i belive its like a 35-65 split in the x-type

> [@AlbinoMonkeyRat](#):
>
> Contour (FWD) = Mondeo (AWD) = X-Type (AWD)
> 
> it’s a lot easier to make a contour AWD than most other American FWD cars. If you want a bolt-on project that _could_ be a sleeper, this is a good one. if I had the money and the desire to deal with Fords, that would be one project I would do. Yeah, same engine, but different transmission, for obvious reasons.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dont-die-jaguar/12874)._
