# Dual/Quad Core?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 21, 2007, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167 "2007-02-21T18:02:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2007, 6:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167/23 "2007-02-23T06:54:34Z")

</div>

> [@Remember Cuban "I cant pay my bills" crisis?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/remember-cuban-i-cant-pay-my-bills-crisis/22769/67):
>
> True for now Intel is in the lead as far as dual core and quad core goes.
> 
> What the future holds very soon is what will bring AMD to the top again, though.
> 
> AMD has support for 2 processors on one board, to bring their quad core which I believe is better then one processor and 4 cores.
> 
> Then comes in AMD’s quad core single chip, which you could run 2 of on the same board. 2 Processors and 8 cores…yum.
> 
> I’ve been a fan of AMD for a while now, it switches back and forth between who truely has the better chips.
> 
> From what I’ve heard/seen, AMD has been more friendly to over-clocking which is becoming more popular…but who knows. I’m not an expert!

read some overclocking forums. the new core2 is great for overclocking. intel\>amd

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167)._