# Dual/Quad Core?

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [February 21, 2007, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167 "2007-02-21T18:02:02Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![imported\_Jon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/edb3f5/32.png) [@imported\_Jon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_Jon)
#### Post date: [February 23, 2007, 10:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167/27 "2007-02-23T10:48:19Z")

</div>

> [@WWnyspeedD v. damaged wheels](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wwnyspeedd-v-damaged-wheels/28256/9):
>
> amd sucks balls dude…
> 
> intel \> \*  
> and if you want two chips, stop playing with toys and get a xeon board.
> 
> and as far as intel… woodcrest \>\*  
> 🙂

Eh, I wasn’t planning on getting a new board anyways haha…like I said Intel seems to be taking huge leaps ahead of AMD with these chips.

> [@Fun](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fun/28263/3):
>
> intel \> \*  
> sonny \> \*
> 
> I have been spec’ng out a ton of quad core lately. the shit is just rediculous. And remember when purchasing dual/quad core procs. Clock speed really does not matter anymore!

Yeah it’s kind of a whole new ballgame and I don’t know much about it yet, that’s why I’m here! What would be considered the “new clock speed” per say, as in the most important aspect of choosing a processor?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dual-quad-core/188167)._