# DUI check points **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [August 23, 2007, 9:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dui-check-points/191980 "2007-08-23T09:38:21Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 80
**Author:** ![Bravada\_442](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bravada_442/32/5982_2.png) [@Bravada\_442](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bravada_442)\ **Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 7:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dui-check-points/191980/80 "2007-08-29T07:41:53Z")
> [@Who plans to go to their high school reuion ? version 2.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/who-plans-to-go-to-their-high-school-reuion-version-2-0/32168/41): > > While the supreme court does in fact admit that these checkpoints DO violate the 4th amendment, the majority opinion was that “state interest in reducing drunk driving outweighed this minor infringement.” Nowhere does it say anything about writing tickets. IMHO, the supreme court got this one wrong (Just like they got Kelo wrong). > I also find it interesting that the NHTSA study confirms what i had said, that roving patrols are much more effective at finding impaired drivers (without infringing on 4th amendment rights). I enjoy the fact that you have not answered one question that I have posed in my last 2 or 3 posts. You just want to argue and I guess get a kick out of copying things from Wikipedia, which I remind you are edited freely by people from the internet community and are by no means guaranteed to be factually correct at any time. But that’s okay, you won’t reply to any of this either, you’ll go off on another tangent in an attempt to prove your point. I have a funny feeling your tune would change if you or someone you loved got smashed by a drunk driver. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dui-check-points/191980)._