# engine running a little rich/rough????? **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [December 24, 2006, 12:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-running-a-little-rich-rough/186991 "2006-12-24T00:15:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 11
**Author:** ![turboTSI1320](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b782af/32.png) [@turboTSI1320](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turboTSI1320)\ **Post date:** [December 25, 2006, 10:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-running-a-little-rich-rough/186991/11 "2006-12-25T10:32:43Z")
> [@FS: Ladder Shelf (black) furniture](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-ladder-shelf-black-furniture/26264/8): > > all you are funny. i had a 6 cyl gm, it fell apart on me. that one is out. the reason i got the new one is i liked my old one. it was pretty quick, and it did feel faster then my new one. i don’t know how fast new gp gts are, but my 04 beat one. my brother owns it. the new one doesn’t have the same punch. and its true on the b15 frame, if a turbo is added, it is faster auto then the 6 speed. the redline is lower on the specs-se-r then most other imports, that is why the 6 speed is really useless. when nissan made the se-r with a 5 speed, it was actually faster in the 1/4 then the spec-v. a few people have cracked into the low 12’s with a turbo spec-v, at around 6lbs. of boost. there are a few more that have cracked just under 12 seconds with the auto. if it stays n/a, then a stick on my car will always be faster, but the turbo auto is always faster then a stick Must be the same reason my high school english teacher opted for the auto aswell… --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-running-a-little-rich-rough/186991)._