# Engine/Transmission Build Project

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-transmission-build-project/184891>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 11, 2006, 10:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-transmission-build-project/184891 "2006-09-11T10:25:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yamaha](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/yamaha/32/5929_2.png) [@yamaha](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/yamaha)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2006, 10:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-transmission-build-project/184891/7 "2006-09-11T10:53:38Z")

</div>

> [@Anyone wanna drive me to Dayton OH sunday?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-wanna-drive-me-to-dayton-oh-sunday/24184/12):
>
> I am sure SMT would be fine, but it just seems for everything you are doing why not go to a standalone system? You would have so much more control on whats going on with your engine, and it gives you room to grow as i am sure you want to grow.

I’ve been considering going standalone. The main problem between the SMT and the dual rail is timing. The dual rail makes the SMT lose its ability to control it. But there is a “black box” that works around this. It’s coming out soon, and I am going to be working with the Canadian Perfect Power dealer to test for him.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/engine-transmission-build-project/184891)._