# Envy Frenzy 2009 pics: 56k gtfo SRSLY **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [August 1, 2009, 5:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/envy-frenzy-2009-pics-56k-gtfo-srsly/245828 "2009-08-01T17:43:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 57
**Author:** ![slwrthnu](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slwrthnu/32/6296_2.png) [@slwrthnu](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slwrthnu)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2009, 9:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/envy-frenzy-2009-pics-56k-gtfo-srsly/245828/57 "2009-08-03T09:34:51Z")
> [@Kovalev elbow to tucker...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kovalev-elbow-to-tucker/21087/17): > > That white supra was hideous, but the work on it was clean and it was heavily modified etc etc etc etc > > Car shows SUCK in that aspect, that a 100 % MINT car like Ryan’s that is lightly but veryyyy tastefully modded (exterior-wise) and a 100% mint car like Elliot’s that (I’m assuming) has a LOT of time and money into it that is still tastefully modified can be beat out by a big budget ugly hunk of junk. That white Supra and the stupid yellow turbo widebody R32 are examples of this. car shows can not be opinion based, that would not be fair. people modify their cars in the way they like them, and judging has to be objective becasue of the fact that not everyone likes the same things. i guess the fact that i get this is the reason i still like going to shows. i would not go to a show that allowed cars to win that were less heavily modified then others because someone decided that they liked the car more. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/envy-frenzy-2009-pics-56k-gtfo-srsly/245828)._