# Eric's 2008 Honda Fit

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/erics-2008-honda-fit/243133
**Category:** Builds
**Created:** [March 28, 2009, 4:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/erics-2008-honda-fit/243133 "2009-03-28T16:26:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GD3Skier](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gd3skier/32/6400_2.png) [@GD3Skier](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GD3Skier)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2009, 10:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/erics-2008-honda-fit/243133/13 "2009-03-29T10:53:36Z")

</div>

I’m pretty sure for an exhaust I’m going to not skimp out and I’m gonna go with a header b-pipe and axleback from T1R as well. They really did their research on pipe diameters and it turns out that most aftermarket exhaust systems are a tad too wide for the fit to work efficiently, making them pretty much a wash performance wise. Based on the Dyno results Ive seen on [fitfreak.net](http://fitfreak.net) the gains from the T1R setup could be pretty impressive depending on how reliable the results are. Regardless even if its a wash performance wise I really like the baller looks of the T1R set-up.

Heres what AJ Racing got for Dyno results comparing the stock fit vs. The same fit with a T1R I/H/E b-pipe and lightweight crank pulley. Also there is a graph for the exhaust minus the header as well.

Quoted from [fitfreak.net](http://fitfreak.net):

> [@Nissan 300zx Guys Look Inside](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nissan-300zx-guys-look-inside/5879/22):
>
> Sorry, I have been trying to get the dyno done ealier but due to shitty weather (SNOW & Heavy rain) so I wasn’t able to do it any sooner. And NOW the dyno is done and I would like to announce the results to you all 🙂
> 
> **Dyno 1 - Bone stock**  
> **Dyno 12 - T1R Intake + T1R Crank pulley +T1R 50S Cat-back exhaust**  
> **Dyno 19 - T1R Intake + T1R Crank pulley +T1R 50S Cat-back exhaust + T1R HEADER !!!**
> 
> **Here the gains from [COLOR=seagreen]DYNO 19 vs [/COLOR]DYNO 12**  **:**  
> **3000rpm+1whp / +1 lbs**  
> **3500rpm+2whp / +2.5 lbs**  
> **4000rpm+4whp / +4.6 lbs**  
> **4500rpm+3.8whp / +3.8 lbs**  
> **5000rpm+2.6whp / +2.2 lbs**  
> **5500rpm+2.8whp / +3 lbs**  
> **6000rpm+1.07whp / +1.2 lbs**  
> **6500rpm+ 0whp / + 0 lbs**
> 
> **Here’s DYNO 1 vs DYNO 19 :**
> 
> **3000rpm+3.5whp / +4.2 lbs**  
> **3500rpm +6.8whp / +8.2 lbs**  
> **4000rpm +8.3whp / +8.7**  **lbs**  
> **4500rpm+8.8whp / +8.5 lbs**  
> **5000rpm+10.1whp / +10 lbs**  
> **5500rpm +12.9whp / +8 lbs**  
> **6000rpm+13.9whp / +11.8 lbs**  
> **6500rpm+ 14.6whp / + 11.3 lbs**
> 
> **The 38mm piping on the header did biger difference. When we dynoed the 32mm header, the result was same as stock and we only gained a little bit of torque. After we installed the 38mm, we noticed a difference on the dyno right away.**
> 
> **Thanks**  
> **Ben**

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/erics-2008-honda-fit/243133)._
