# Expensive Ugly Ass Hybrid \< 99FRC

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 7, 2010, 6:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983 "2010-05-07T06:36:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![99FRC](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/99frc/32/6335_2.png) [@99FRC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/99FRC)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2010, 8:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983/14 "2010-05-07T08:34:22Z")

</div>

> [@New guy](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-guy/30747/30):
>
> Yeah the only way to get a pretty accurate mpg reading is to have your tank topped off so you can see gas in the filler neck (Which is bad to do on some cars) and drive a known measured distance. Then re fill your tank to the filler neck and calculate.

Or I will let a computer in my car calculate how much fuel was used in whatever distance I drove to come up with a number that is just as accurate as me doing in manually since there are always enough variable to make the calculations +/- 1-2MPG.

But that is not the point of this thread…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983)._
