# Expensive Ugly Ass Hybrid \< 99FRC

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 7, 2010, 6:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983 "2010-05-07T06:36:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn96VR-4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2010, 2:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983/27 "2010-05-08T14:21:32Z")

</div>

> [@What the HELL happened???????](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-the-hell-happened/31725/28):
>
> No offense, but those digital displays are known to be 3-4 mpg off.
> 
> Still insanity.

Or more.

99 C5 should be getting 26 or so MPG at best. Still impressive.

I got 25-27MPG when I tuned my VR-4 to a CEL on the highway. That car made like 600AWHP+. However, that’s misleading because it’s a FI car on pump gas, etc.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/expensive-ugly-ass-hybrid-99frc/251983)._