# F#ck Dumbestics, Turbo honda 4L

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [August 17, 2006, 8:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099 "2006-08-17T20:42:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Rocket\_442](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rocket_442/32/3086_2.png) [@Rocket\_442](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Rocket_442)
#### Post date: [August 20, 2006, 8:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099/36 "2006-08-20T08:29:51Z")

</div>

> [@SI01](#):
>
> Not very well actually, at least for D stock. ITR’s and R32’s tend to pwn me. God forbid I should depict my own car in my avatar.
> 
> I still don’t know why I should find that number that impressive. 640 HP isn’t the end all, let alone in a Corvette. Excuse me for not drooling.

I just don’t understand the logic you are using. Because it is faster than a Subaru or Honda from the factory (obviously costs more, well besides the overpriced NSX), you are bitching that its still not impressive. That car looks fully streetable, and should easily do 10’s.

Some people want a car that is fast as hell, but still able to be driven on the streets, and for that, I’d say this car is pretty damn impressive.

You’re _probably_ the same type of guy that would drool over a stock skyline, but you bitch about a 640hp vette.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099)._