# F#ck Dumbestics, Turbo honda 4L

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 17, 2006, 8:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099 "2006-08-17T20:42:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 42

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rocket\_442](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rocket_442/32/3086_2.png) [@Rocket\_442](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Rocket_442)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 5:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099/42 "2006-08-20T17:08:44Z")

</div>

> [@JoesTypeS](#):
>
> Because it was a direct competitor to the Ferrari 348, 355 and 360…not the fucking corvette…if anything it was underpriced for the market they were going for.

Umm… Direct competitor would incline that it was able to “compete” with them. The NSX was no doubt a “cool looking” car, but just not what it was made out to be.

It cannot keep up with a Stock Vette from the same year, let alone a Ferrari or Porsche.

Lets see, a Stock 2002 Honda NSX-R, is STILL slower, than the BASE Corvette of 2001. Pretty sad for the price if you ask me.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099)._