# F#ck Dumbestics, Turbo honda 4L

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 17, 2006, 8:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099 "2006-08-17T20:42:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 70

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2006, 6:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099/70 "2006-08-21T18:55:01Z")

</div>

Although I’m sure you’ll throw this back at me since I mocked Best Motoring. Top Gear’s review of the NSX summed up my opinion perfectly. It’s an AWESOME car, but for the price it should have a more exotic engine, and less parts should be lifted from every other honda/acura. While it is an amazing car it just falls short IMO. You can honestly say if you had 80-90k to blow, you’d buy an NSX? I think not. If they were priced at 45k they would’ve sold a shitload, rather than the 7 they sold in the UK in it’s final year.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099)._
