# F#ck Dumbestics, Turbo honda 4L

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 17, 2006, 8:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099 "2006-08-17T20:42:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 73

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JoesTypeS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joestypes/32/7190_2.png) [@JoesTypeS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JoesTypeS)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2006, 8:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099/73 "2006-08-21T20:13:36Z")

</div>

> [@MPD47](#):
>
> Although I’m sure you’ll throw this back at me since I mocked Best Motoring. Top Gear’s review of the NSX summed up my opinion perfectly. It’s an AWESOME car, but for the price it should have a more exotic engine, and less parts should be lifted from every other honda/acura. While it is an amazing car it just falls short IMO. You can honestly say if you had 80-90k to blow, you’d buy an NSX? I think not. If they were priced at 45k they would’ve sold a shitload, rather than the 7 they sold in the UK in it’s final year.

now? no…I’d buy a C2S…in 03? if I had to buy new…in a fucking heartbeat…I really don’t see any other choice for a new car in that price range

> [@MPD47](#):
>
> If they were priced at 45k they would’ve sold a shitload

You can’t price a car like that at 45K…that’s like saying they should have priced the GT3 @ 50K b/c they would have sold a lot more…It’s an all aluminium chassis…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099)._