# F#ck Dumbestics, Turbo honda 4L

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 17, 2006, 8:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099 "2006-08-17T20:42:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 81

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JoesTypeS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joestypes/32/7190_2.png) [@JoesTypeS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JoesTypeS)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2006, 8:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099/81 "2006-08-21T20:30:03Z")

</div>

> [@MPD47](#):
>
> car isnt as good as it should be for $90k.

It’s every bit as good or better than the 90k porsche…

Interior design is subjective, it’s still of the highest quality in fit and finish.

Is the engine powerful enough to hang out with the _massive_ 3.6L porsche? Yup.

Does the suspension help it hang with the the $110+K 996 TT around a track? Yup.

So for 90K it outperforms other sports cars that cost 90K

I don’t think 911s are overpriced…

I fail to see how it’s not good enough.

It might not be the car for you, but it’s not overpriced

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/f-ck-dumbestics-turbo-honda-4l/16099)._