# Favorite Sportscar's V. Looks Only

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/favorite-sportscars-v-looks-only/39981>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [December 9, 2007, 7:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/favorite-sportscars-v-looks-only/39981 "2007-12-09T07:24:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 72

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![66impalass](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/66impalass/32/7429_2.png) [@66impalass](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/66impalass)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2007, 12:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/favorite-sportscars-v-looks-only/39981/72 "2007-12-10T12:15:35Z")

</div>

a skyline is no way a sports car, at best its a GT

[quote=“Geoff,post:71,topic:39981"”]

…because platforms like the STi and Evo aren’t designed for precise handling and acceleration right? They are by no means supercars, but I’d still stick them in ‘sports car’ or ‘performance’ categories, as they cars are pretty purpose-built and performance-oriented if you ask me. RWD and 2 seats aren’t concrete criteria for being a ‘sports car’. Just my opinion on the definition.

[/quote]

wow, sorry I disturbed the sand in your vagina, but there is no way a 4-door car will never be a ports car

/thread

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/favorite-sportscars-v-looks-only/39981)._