# FCC loses ruling :(

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [April 6, 2010, 2:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886 "2010-04-06T14:42:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 2:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/1 "2010-04-06T14:42:33Z")

</div>

[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100406/ap\_on\_hi\_te/us\_tec\_internet\_rules](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100406/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_internet_rules)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 2:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/2 "2010-04-06T14:54:21Z")

</div>

☹  
Just one more example of how big business runs this country

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bacon](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bacon/32/7230_2.png) [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 2:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/3 "2010-04-06T14:55:18Z")

</div>

:-/

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 3:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/4 "2010-04-06T15:02:23Z")

</div>

They should have Congress give them the authority to regulate broadband now before the elections…The Republicans will do their best to make sure that doesn’t happen if they gain seats in Nov.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Penfold](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/penfold/32/5007_2.png) [@Penfold](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Penfold)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 3:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/5 "2010-04-06T15:24:03Z")

</div>

I think congress has full authority to declare broadband a vital infrastructure and regulate it’s neutrality and availability. If we pay farmers to grow food, we can surely pay to make sure we have a stable and far reaching broadband network, as long as the gov keeps their dirty spying hands out of it.

I think I will write Higgens an e-mail.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tunerfreak](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tunerfreak/32/7427_2.png) [@Tunerfreak](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Tunerfreak)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 7:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/6 "2010-04-06T19:25:11Z")

</div>

i read this earlier and i found it funny that a lot of people over at engadget support this

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glitch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/0ea827/32.png) [@glitch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/glitch)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2010, 7:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/7 "2010-04-06T19:36:20Z")

</div>

Good :tup:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 3:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/8 "2010-04-07T03:16:18Z")

</div>

I don’t know if others caught this but this allows ISPs to prioritize traffic like P2P

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 4:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/9 "2010-04-07T04:04:41Z")

</div>

> [@Joe](#):
>
> They should have Congress give them the authority to regulate broadband now before the elections…The Republicans will do their best to make sure that doesn’t happen if they gain seats in Nov.

If you bothered reading the article you would see a Republican was in charge of the FCC when the original restriction against Comcast to prevent them from blocking bittorrent was placed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 5:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/10 "2010-04-07T05:49:44Z")

</div>

that’s lame

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geehee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/geehee/32/7238_2.png) [@Geehee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Geehee)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 5:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/11 "2010-04-07T05:54:06Z")

</div>

> [@"Leaving a Big Cat to Die" - abandoned Jag XJ220](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/leaving-a-big-cat-to-die-abandoned-jag-xj220/152861/3):
>
> Sad face is saaaaaaaaaaaaad.

☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glitch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/0ea827/32.png) [@glitch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/glitch)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 6:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/12 "2010-04-07T06:55:35Z")

</div>

> [@LZ](#):
>
> I don’t know if others caught this but this allows ISPs to prioritize traffic like P2P

Exactly.

They named it “Net Neutrality” to make it seem like they are trying to help but in reality it gives them the power to block and control the flow of information. If you read the details, it gets kinda scary of what they can do if it passes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/13 "2010-04-07T07:04:24Z")

</div>

> [@glitch](#):
>
> Exactly.
> 
> They named it “Net Neutrality” to make it seem like they are trying to help but in reality it gives them the power to block and control the flow of information. If you read the details, it gets kinda scary of what they can do if it passes.

Why would you say it’s good then? I don’t really think you fully understand.

As I understand it, the FCC is FOR net neutrality which means that you cannot censor what your users do on the internet. They were trying to tell Comcast that they could NOT block specific traffic. This court overuled the FCC and told comcast they COULD block specific traffic (like p2p).

Or am I misunderstanding? I don’t think I am.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/14 "2010-04-07T07:19:40Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> Why would you say it’s good then? I don’t really think you fully understand.
> 
> As I understand it, the FCC is FOR net neutrality which means that you cannot censor what your users do on the internet. They were trying to tell Comcast that they could NOT block specific traffic. This court overuled the FCC and told comcast they COULD block specific traffic (like p2p).
> 
> Or am I misunderstanding? I don’t think I am.

No, you’ve got it. You’re trying to explain it to a guy who fights other neon drivers that he rear ended in the street though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matt\_Danger](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/matt_danger/32/4981_2.png) [@Matt\_Danger](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Matt_Danger)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/15 "2010-04-07T07:31:49Z")

</div>

Ugh

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glitch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/0ea827/32.png) [@glitch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/glitch)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/16 "2010-04-07T07:40:03Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> Why would you say it’s good then?

I didn’t, I’m saying it’s good it didn’t pass. Net Neutrality is basically an oxymoron which gives the government control over the internet; this can lead to censorship, violations of privacy, and backdoor deals between the government, ISP’s and others companies. Trust me, it’s not what you think it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![97FormulaWS-6](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/97formulaws-6/32/7384_2.png) [@97FormulaWS-6](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/97FormulaWS-6)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/17 "2010-04-07T07:42:52Z")

</div>

> [@glitch](#):
>
> I didn’t, I’m saying it’s good it didn’t pass. Net Neutrality is basically an oxymoron which gives the government and ISP’s control over the internet; they can block whatever they want. Or consider sites they don’t like a “low priority” and ones they do a “high priority”. This can lead to censorship, violations of privacy, and backdoor deals between ISP’s and others companies. Trust me, it’s not what you think it is.

Uhm… you’re backwards…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glitch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/0ea827/32.png) [@glitch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/glitch)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/18 "2010-04-07T07:45:09Z")

</div>

> [@97FormulaWS-6](#):
>
> Uhm… you’re backwards…

No, I’m not. You guys are just fooled by it’s name. I don’t want the FCC in control of internet bandwith. The cons out weigh the pros in my opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/19 "2010-04-07T07:50:20Z")

</div>

> [@glitch](#):
>
> No, I’m not. You guys are just fooled by it’s name. I don’t want the FCC in control of internet bandwith. The cons out weigh the pros in my opinion.

You’re officially worse than Jeg. Congrats.

> **[Net neutrality](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality)**
>
> Network neutrality, often referred to as net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally, offering users and online content providers consistent rates irrespective of content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination address, or method of communication (i.e., without price discrimination). Net neutrality was advocated for in the 1990s by the presidential administration of Bill Clinto Su...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glitch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/0ea827/32.png) [@glitch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/glitch)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 7:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886/20 "2010-04-07T07:54:57Z")

</div>

> [@JayS](#):
>
> You’re officially worse than Jeg. Congrats.
> 
> [Net neutrality - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality)

Negative:

> This article is written in the style of a debate rather than an encyclopedic summary.  
> 🙂

Net neutrality will STILL bring negative regulation as it stands.

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fcc-loses-ruling/152886.md?page=2)
