# first look, 09 camaro (vid) **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [June 13, 2006, 5:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830 "2006-06-13T17:07:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![imported\_gearhead](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/imported_gearhead/32/5957_2.png) [@imported\_gearhead](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_gearhead)\ **Post date:** [June 13, 2006, 5:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/1 "2006-06-13T17:07:53Z")
[![http://thumbs.vidiac.com/e2891d19-7a53-4df7-8d17-4f747f5ac52c.jpg](http://thumbs.vidiac.com/e2891d19-7a53-4df7-8d17-4f747f5ac52c.jpg)](http://videos.streetfire.net/video/e2891d19-7a53-4df7-8d17-4f747f5ac52c.htm)[Click here to see Video](http://videos.streetfire.net/video/e2891d19-7a53-4df7-8d17-4f747f5ac52c.htm) I dunno how i feel about it ---
**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\ **Post date:** [June 13, 2006, 6:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/2 "2006-06-13T18:15:25Z")
[http://www.pittspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25915](http://www.pittspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25915) ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 5:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/3 "2006-06-14T05:01:01Z")
total sickness…i need one ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 5:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/4 "2006-06-14T05:23:40Z")
🤮 and it’s only going to get worse. Once GM lets their fine designing staff loose on the final production car, it will look truely horrible. mustang\>camaro - always has, always will. ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 8:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/5 "2006-06-14T08:06:09Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#): > > 🤮 > > and it’s only going to get worse. Once GM lets their fine designing staff loose on the final production car, it will look truely horrible. > > mustang\>camaro - always has, always will. I will assume you are talking looks…I think 79 was the ugliest for both Vs ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 8:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/6 "2006-06-14T08:49:08Z")
> [@bics56](#): > > I will assume you are talking looks nope - being an all around good car. mustang\>camaro ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 9:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/7 "2006-06-14T09:03:51Z")
ahhh…wow you have a lot to learn…but we nee dpeople like you to make the world go round :love: ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 9:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/8 "2006-06-14T09:47:16Z")
wow…it took til 2005 for the mustang gt to finally eclipse the 300hp mark…camaro z28 did that like almost 10 years ago, bud. ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 9:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/9 "2006-06-14T09:53:48Z")
> [@smokeyburnouts](#): > > wow…it took til 2005 for the mustang gt to finally eclipse the 300hp mark…camaro z28 did that like almost 10 years ago, bud. what’s your point? ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 10:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/10 "2006-06-14T10:04:17Z")
> [@smokeyburnouts](#): > > wow…it took til 2005 for the mustang gt to finally eclipse the 300hp mark…camaro z28 did that like almost 10 years ago, bud. it was 11 years ago…but for just Z and TA then it is about 9 ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 10:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/11 "2006-06-14T10:32:41Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#): > > what’s your point? whats yours? the cars are suposed to be competitors and the GM motors have been killing the stangs for how long. so how can you say that its a better car? they are performance cars and the GM cars outperform the ford. the ford has better sales but alot of that is also due to the v6 models. so in sales, then ok the stang is a better car but its not a better performing car. you argue this in every fbod thread, so i’m just gonna stop anyways, cause there is no point and you dont own a stang anyways, so who cares. anyways, that new camaro is sick lookin. i really want one. ---
**Author:** ![cleanquick306](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/48db29/32.png) [@cleanquick306](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/cleanquick306)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 10:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/12 "2006-06-14T10:45:43Z")
i am def. a mustang fan, but those new camaro’s look alot more aggresive to me, than a stock mustang gt ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 11:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/13 "2006-06-14T11:49:53Z")
> [@smokeyburnouts](#): > > whats yours? the cars are suposed to be competitors and the GM motors have been killing the stangs for how long. so how can you say that its a better car? they are performance cars and the GM cars outperform the ford. the ford has better sales but alot of that is also due to the v6 models. so in sales, then ok the stang is a better car but its not a better performing car. you argue this in every fbod thread, so i’m just gonna stop anyways, cause there is no point and you dont own a stang anyways, so who cares. > > anyways, that new camaro is sick lookin. i really want one. hahahahahahahaha mustang\>camaro ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 11:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/14 "2006-06-14T11:51:26Z")
> [@cleanquick306](#): > > i am def. a mustang fan, but those new camaro’s look alot more aggresive to me, than a stock mustang gt this just in - AThe camaro that the public will get a chance to buy will look nothing like the car in the vid or the pics you have seen on the interweb. It will look like a cobalt or g6 by the time gm designers are done fucking it up. ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 12:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/15 "2006-06-14T12:38:18Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#): > > this just in - AThe camaro that the public will get a chance to buy will look nothing like the car in the vid or the pics you have seen on the interweb. It will look like a cobalt or g6 by the time gm designers are done fucking it up. lets hope not…one good thing is that the prototype looks like the drawings, so we’ll see how far they take it. ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 12:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/16 "2006-06-14T12:44:19Z")
umm 87-93 the mustand CRUSHED the camaro… until the 93 LT1 Those 3rd gen 305’s and 350’s were absolute turds ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 1:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/17 "2006-06-14T13:09:45Z")
350’s were not as bad as you make them out to be ---
**Author:** ![Swarzkopf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7feea3/32.png) [@Swarzkopf](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Swarzkopf)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2006, 1:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/18 "2006-06-14T13:31:53Z")
My opinion as a Mustang enthusiast (and current owner of both a Mustang and a Firebird): I think that the mid-late 80s was all Mustang- but quite honestly, from a strictly performance standpoint, 93-03 was all Fbody (Mustang couldn’t really compete with the Fbody camp until the 03 Mach/Cobra came out). Obviously both cars have their strong and weak points throughout their histories. ---
**Author:** ![scott5](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e480ec/32.png) [@scott5](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/scott5)\ **Post date:** [June 15, 2006, 10:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/19 "2006-06-15T10:22:21Z")
but dont forget the z/ta have 5.7s while the mustangs have 4.6s… ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [June 15, 2006, 10:27am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830/20 "2006-06-15T10:27:43Z")
> [@scott5](#): > > but dont forget the z/ta have 5.7s while the mustangs have 4.6s… point? [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/first-look-09-camaro-vid/182830.md?page=2)