# Ford 302 = Weak??? **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [May 17, 2005, 1:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393 "2005-05-17T13:08:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2005, 10:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/41 "2005-05-18T22:33:27Z")
> [@Blue4](#): > > not stock, the block may hold the power, but the pistons/rods will take a shit way before that i guess teh few stock bottom end cars i seen werent stock then making over 1000hp :rolleyes: ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 5:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/42 "2005-05-19T05:01:52Z")
> [@raverjames](#): > > I dont like the 4g63 too much. I was always an SR20DET fan. Stock bottom end on that engine can handly 525+ whp and when built they have hit 700+. Sad that a 2L can do that but Fords 5L cant. The 4.6L does seem impressive though. i was making referance to darkstar on that one. a chunk of the block in his talon broke off > [@Quik](#): > > i guess teh few stock bottom end cars i seen werent stock then making over 1000hp :rolleyes: they were probably sleeved ---
**Author:** ![brokeasskorean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e19b73/32.png) [@brokeasskorean](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/brokeasskorean)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 5:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/43 "2005-05-19T05:10:20Z")
> [@raverjames](#): > > I dont like the 4g63 too much. I was always an SR20DET fan. Stock bottom end on that engine can handly 525+ whp and when built they have hit 700+. Sad that a 2L can do that but Fords 5L cant. The 4.6L does seem impressive though. not to go OT but the 4G63 has made about the same numbers on stock bottom ends as well… ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 5:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/44 "2005-05-19T05:30:07Z")
> [@raverjames](#): > > I dont like the 4g63 too much. I was always an SR20DET fan. Stock bottom end on that engine can handly 525+ whp and when built they have hit 700+. Sad that a 2L can do that but Fords 5L cant. The 4.6L does seem impressive though. there are stock 4G63 blocks putting out over 1000hp and they can handle block splitting HP on a 302 with nothing more than a good head gasket and ARP head studs. :slap: ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 5:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/45 "2005-05-19T05:31:49Z")
> [@BlkP42E](#): > > yeah… get a 4g63 where chunks of the block break off yeah because that happens all the time… > [@HaNnIBaL64](#): > > do i hear a mutha fuckin :owned: no, that OHHHHWNED you think you hear is your sister and your brother fooling around in the next room without you. ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 5:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/46 "2005-05-19T05:58:52Z")
> [@Darkstar](#): > > no, that OHHHHWNED you think you hear is your sister and your brother fooling around in the next room without you. 🤣🤣🤣 ---
**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 6:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/47 "2005-05-19T06:39:57Z")
> [@Quik](#): > > i guess teh few stock bottom end cars i seen werent stock then making over 1000hp :rolleyes: ask spangler then why he isnt using a stock bottom end LS1 for his turbo project ---
**Author:** ![raverjames](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/57b2e6/32.png) [@raverjames](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/raverjames)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 8:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/48 "2005-05-19T08:17:27Z")
> [@Darkstar](#): > > there are stock 4G63 blocks putting out over 1000hp and they can handle block splitting HP on a 302 with nothing more than a good head gasket and ARP head studs. :slap: I am fully aware of the capabilities of the 4g63. It is a matter of preferance. I have heard more people have issues with the DSM engine than with the SR20. Both are decent engines. ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 8:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/49 "2005-05-19T08:40:17Z")
> [@Blue4](#): > > ask spangler then why he isnt using a stock bottom end LS1 for his turbo project he probably got money to burn, or he wanted larger cubes. ive seen it on ls1.tech…since you know it all you go search for it ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 8:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/50 "2005-05-19T08:44:49Z")
> [@Quik](#): > > he probably got money to burn, or he wanted larger cubes. ive seen it on ls1.tech…since you know it all you go search for it it’s on the internet, it must be true ---
**Author:** ![oneslowbowtie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/d78d45/32.png) [@oneslowbowtie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/oneslowbowtie)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 8:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/51 "2005-05-19T08:49:58Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#): > > it’s on the internet, I’m a gay porn star :eek2: :eek2: Wow, old habits must be hard to break. ---
**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 8:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/52 "2005-05-19T08:53:45Z")
> [@Blue4](#): > > ask spangler then why he isnt using a stock bottom end LS1 for his turbo project because i found him a hell of a deal on a 377 bottom end fucktard! :spank: ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 8:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/53 "2005-05-19T08:55:53Z")
> [@oneslowbowtie](#): > > :eek2: :eek2: Wow, old habits must be hard to break. porn star\>punk ass bitch who drives a gm :love: ---
**Author:** ![T70\_Tsi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/898d66/32.png) [@T70\_Tsi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/T70_Tsi)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/54 "2005-05-19T09:00:38Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#): > > :dunno: > > If the motor sucked, why would thousands of people still build them for racing and street performance? top fuel use hemi’s :kekegay: ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/55 "2005-05-19T09:05:14Z")
> [@BlueMeanieTSi](#): > > top fuel use hemi’s :kekegay: hemi’s suck 427\>426 ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/56 "2005-05-19T09:07:07Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#): > > hemi’s suck > 427\>426 for once this hick is correct ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/57 "2005-05-19T09:15:43Z")
> [@Quik](#): > > for once this hick is correct :love: ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/58 "2005-05-19T09:23:16Z")
go use that tongue on oneslowbowtie, hes the one that needs the lovin ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/59 "2005-05-19T09:25:01Z")
> [@Quik](#): > > go use that tongue on oneslowbowtie, hes the one that needs the lovin I like men with bikes :naughty: 💏 :embarassd ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2005, 9:27am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393/60 "2005-05-19T09:27:52Z")
um, um smokey got a bike [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393.md?page=2) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-302-weak/174393.md?page=4)