# Ford engines\>GM engines

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-engines-gm-engines/192549>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [September 20, 2007, 10:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-engines-gm-engines/192549 "2007-09-20T10:20:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 100

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![burnyd](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/burnyd/32/6020_2.png) [@burnyd](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/burnyd)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2007, 8:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-engines-gm-engines/192549/100 "2007-09-24T08:09:14Z")

</div>

> [@Getting to Task Manager.....](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/getting-to-task-manager/32609/33):
>
> I see less wires and hoses under the more modern engine bays then the 80’s and 90’s cars.
> 
> With added technology has come simplicity. It’s a lot more pleasent to work on an ECU with a laptop then make sure eleventy billion vacuum hoses you can’t even see are hooked up correctly.

haha

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-engines-gm-engines/192549)._