# Ford|GM Merger

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-gm-merger/200740>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [November 19, 2008, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-gm-merger/200740 "2008-11-19T10:19:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 69

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nothingface5384](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/779978/32.png) [@Nothingface5384](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Nothingface5384)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2008, 2:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-gm-merger/200740/69 "2008-11-23T14:34:57Z")

</div>

i thought ford passed up…and gm and chrysler were supose to merge?  
but then again they’re all trying to getballout money…soo…

> [@To teach a man to fish...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/to-teach-a-man-to-fish/38781/29):
>
> im obviously bias but olds was always the innovative division of GM. Cutlass was the #1 selling car for a long time. i’m saying olds would save GM but its a hell of a lot better option than saab or saturn. i mean really if you are looking for a euro sedan where would u have saab on ur list… there are so many other options. i dont even know how a company like that stays in business. Maybe George Carlin should have said “these words have never been said before… Gee I need a new car, i think I’ll buy a new saab” i have never heard anyone say they want a saab, i’ve never heard anyone even mention saab.

yes sure…dont forget buicks experimental turbo engines  
all the divisions went down because of corperate gm and chebby…

if all the divisions competed against each other like in the 60/s 70s they’d be better off…more spark for that innovation…instead of just cookie cutting every new model they comeout with…  
either way though…the newest car i’ll ever own will be my 72…and other then that go toyota trucks ha

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ford-gm-merger/200740)._
