# fox body with jet engine... Yes Jet engine.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fox-body-with-jet-engine-yes-jet-engine/185669>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [October 18, 2006, 12:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fox-body-with-jet-engine-yes-jet-engine/185669 "2006-10-18T00:58:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![burnyd](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/burnyd/32/6020_2.png) [@burnyd](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/burnyd)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2006, 12:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fox-body-with-jet-engine-yes-jet-engine/185669/21 "2006-10-18T12:28:07Z")

</div>

> [@Best NEW Car or Truck for under 17k](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/best-new-car-or-truck-for-under-17k/25165/19):
>
> newer 99+ 4.6 mustangs are faster that your mr2 stock for stock. maybe not the 94-98 turdstangs or the 5.0’s, but it would be close. An mr2 turbo is what 15 flat in the 1.4?

At stock boost best I did was 14.6… stock boost = 10psi… at 14psi I ran better times. Which you can argue and say it isnt stock after the boost controller but I pulled off a 13.8 on a completely stock car.

But correct me if Im wrong but doesnt a 4.6 do around a 14.5 in the 1/4?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fox-body-with-jet-engine-yes-jet-engine/185669)._