# FS/FT:  Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-ft-canon-ef-24-105mm-f-4l-is/263314
**Category:** Classifieds
**Created:** [April 7, 2012, 7:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-ft-canon-ef-24-105mm-f-4l-is/263314 "2012-04-07T07:21:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![AMD\_IS\_THE\_BEST](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/amd_is_the_best/32/6342_2.png) [@AMD\_IS\_THE\_BEST](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/AMD_IS_THE_BEST)
#### Post date: [April 8, 2012, 5:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-ft-canon-ef-24-105mm-f-4l-is/263314/4 "2012-04-08T05:35:39Z")

</div>

> [@New guy say hi](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-guy-say-hi/49075/3):
>
> GLWS man. As always, some quality glass ya got there. I want a 24-70 L myself.

Thanks man! You’re better off keeping the 17-55 (I believe you have that lens) in my opinion if you’re staying crop. It was hard to part with mine. Better range on a crop body, 2.8 AND IS. Phenomenal lens.

> [@super charger vs.turbo charger](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/super-charger-vs-turbo-charger/48975/37):
>
> Scoop up the 24-70 f/2.8 II when it comes out, Nick. Supposed to be much better.

I’d love to Jim but it’s going to cost double the version one. Like $2,200 and still no IS, WTF! I know it’s a ton better, but out of the budget. Not to mention I’d prob rather have something else at the price.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-ft-canon-ef-24-105mm-f-4l-is/263314)._