# Fuck California

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fuck-california/185109>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [September 21, 2006, 5:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fuck-california/185109 "2006-09-21T05:39:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 46

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2006, 5:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fuck-california/185109/46 "2006-09-22T05:00:12Z")

</div>

> [@FS: Kumho Ecsta SPT 205/40 17's now with pics. yay](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-kumho-ecsta-spt-205-40-17s-now-with-pics-yay/24308/3):
>
> This is kind of ass-backward. I’d rather see the government reduce pollution by requiring better fuel economy. My 1990 Honda CRX HF didn’t have half of the modern pollution controls, but it got 50 - 60 mpg on the highway… less fuel consumed = less pollution.

cars get heavier because people want the comforts of home in a car. Find a new car that weighs the same as a '90 crx and has the same performance,then check it’s gas mileage.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fuck-california/185109)._
