# GM cancels new DOHC V8 plans

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-cancels-new-dohc-v8-plans/41171>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [January 3, 2008, 2:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-cancels-new-dohc-v8-plans/41171 "2008-01-03T14:28:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TORQDSS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/torqdss/32/5125_2.png) [@TORQDSS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TORQDSS)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2008, 6:11am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-cancels-new-dohc-v8-plans/41171/30 "2008-01-05T06:11:28Z")

</div>

> [@reliant\_turbo](#):
>
> not really. they both have their place.
> 
> headflow is far more important that valvetrain configuration. its more important for the valvetrain to stay stable at the intended rpm rather than to involve pushrods.
> 
> Brian

I know, I’m just being a stubborn/tunnel visioned GM guy… I can’t help myself sometimes

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-cancels-new-dohc-v8-plans/41171)._