# GM disbanding high performance division **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [February 26, 2009, 5:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-disbanding-high-performance-division/242421 "2009-02-26T05:04:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 10
**Author:** ![Ilya](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ilya/32/6404_2.png) [@Ilya](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Ilya)\ **Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 8:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-disbanding-high-performance-division/242421/10 "2009-02-26T08:39:56Z")
> [@WTB: 92-95 Civic hatch](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtb-92-95-civic-hatch/14805/8): > > yah… > > GM has way too many vehicles that are so similar to one another, they could get rid of a few models and basically have the same thing… > > for example, look at the cobalt SS and the HHR SS? Come on? seriously? they have the same exact power plant just ones uglier then the other. > > IMO, what they need to do is have a few of your everyday, good gas mileage small economy cars, a few SUV’s and then the performance line of camaros and vettes… +1. HHR is one of the ugliest things on the road. I’d pick a Cobalt SS 11 times out of 10 instead of an HHR. Chevy should have the Cobalt, Aveo, Lumina, Tahoe, Silverado, Suburban, Corvette, and Camaro. That’s it. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-disbanding-high-performance-division/242421)._