# GM mulls 4-cylinder engine for new Camaro

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-mulls-4-cylinder-engine-for-new-camaro/45302>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 19, 2008, 5:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-mulls-4-cylinder-engine-for-new-camaro/45302 "2008-03-19T17:56:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![traumadog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8baadc/32.png) [@traumadog](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/traumadog)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 7:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-mulls-4-cylinder-engine-for-new-camaro/45302/13 "2008-03-19T19:30:37Z")

</div>

> [@05OrangeSS](#):
>
> the LNF most definately does NOT get 30 mpg…I’m sure this will help sell more cars, but using the gas mileage as an excuse is bullshit. I bet the v8 version with the 6 speed will get almost as good as highway mpg as the 4 banger version.

Hmm… the LNF in the Solstice GXP gets 19/28 highway ('08 numbers) with a 5-speed… makes me wonder how it’d do with the A6/M6. And the only way the LS3 will match the highway MPG is with cylinder deactivation, so you’d argue the LNF is simpler in that regard.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gm-mulls-4-cylinder-engine-for-new-camaro/45302)._