# GNX #192

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gnx-192/118037>\
**Category:** SON240sx Automotive\
**Created:** [August 27, 2008, 2:45pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gnx-192/118037 "2008-08-27T14:45:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![roast](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/roast/32/5498_2.png) [@roast](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/roast)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2008, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gnx-192/118037/20 "2008-09-15T18:02:05Z")

</div>

> [@Seen this on the 990 yesterday.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/seen-this-on-the-990-yesterday/18340/5):
>
> Hmm I pretty sure I said same “horsepower” ratings as todays “Camry” (and Altima Coupe) no mention of torque there Rich. Accord Coupe runs sub 6s and like 14.0 flat yet its less displacement and is NA?! You get what I’m saying right?
> 
> And we all know what GNs (or any turbo car) can do with mods…I have GT-R that came with 276 stock too remember.

:rolleyes: You’re right, you didn’t mention torque… Not like I really care, but it should be analysed. Dollar for Dollar, we both know the GN has more straight line potential… (notice I only mentioned straight line)

Altima coupe 3.5SE and the Camry SE with the 3.5L V6…

The Camry makes 248 lb.-ft. at 4600 RPM  
The Altima makes 258 @ 4400

I do think torque is part of the equation and it should be pointed out that the GN has over 100 lb.-ft on each car at lower RPMs at that.

Comparing a GNX to a altima/camry is quite surprising as the HP numbers are damn close but neither car will ever be a GNX.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gnx-192/118037)._