# Going 2 sizes smaller on the SRT, thoughts?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/going-2-sizes-smaller-on-the-srt-thoughts/44511>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 5, 2008, 6:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/going-2-sizes-smaller-on-the-srt-thoughts/44511 "2008-03-05T18:22:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 48

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brent\_strong](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/brent_strong/32/7203_2.png) [@brent\_strong](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/brent_strong)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2008, 11:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/going-2-sizes-smaller-on-the-srt-thoughts/44511/48 "2008-03-06T11:03:27Z")

</div>

> [@chino](#):
>
> why not go 15’s and get a better wheel to save even more weight tho?
> 
> even a semi-decent wheel in 17" can be down to that weight

Rota slips are pretty darn light. Sure, the original Spoon SW388 were lighter, but at triple the cost…

I want to say the 15x8 slipstream should be 12-14lbs; there aren’t many 17x8s near that at any cost.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/going-2-sizes-smaller-on-the-srt-thoughts/44511)._
