# Good read: Acura K23A1 Turbo

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/good-read-acura-k23a1-turbo/16476>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 25, 2006, 3:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/good-read-acura-k23a1-turbo/16476 "2006-08-25T15:25:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 47

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NA-KING](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/na-king/32/7515_2.png) [@NA-KING](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/NA-KING)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2006, 3:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/good-read-acura-k23a1-turbo/16476/47 "2006-08-31T15:15:44Z")

</div>

> [@Zer0DazE](#):
>
> more boost doesnt always equate to more power, or a broader (is that a word?) power band.  
> a prime example would be the sky redline with its compression being down in the low 9’s.
> 
> as for the attitude. it makes no difference if i know you or not. the posts with my opinions are fact and experience backed, and yours are not.  
> this car is a production car with compression that is too low for the low (in relative terms) boost pressure i am sure it will be running.

YAY… Like I said: Your right, I’m wrong… THANKS.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/good-read-acura-k23a1-turbo/16476)._