# Google Chrome **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [September 2, 2008, 10:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/google-chrome/199372 "2008-09-02T22:05:59Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 18
**Author:** ![fshowcars](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fshowcars/32/5937_2.png) [@fshowcars](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fshowcars)\ **Post date:** [September 5, 2008, 7:27am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/google-chrome/199372/18 "2008-09-05T07:27:00Z")
> [@Sold Please Delete](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sold-please-delete/36413/15): > > this is semi not cool: > > Much ink and many electrons are being spilled over Google’s Chrome browser (discussed here twice in recent days): from deep backgrounders to performance benchmarks to its vulnerability to a carpet-bombing flaw. The latest angle to be explored is Chrome’s end-user license agreement. It does not look consumer-friendly. “By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.” resolved as an oversight: > **[Update to Google Chrome's terms of service](https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/update-to-google-chromes-terms-of.html)** > > Insights from Googlers into our products, technology, and the Google culture --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/google-chrome/199372)._