# GPU's too powerful for their own good?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [October 16, 2008, 10:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558 "2008-10-16T10:42:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 10:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/1 "2008-10-16T10:42:37Z")

</div>

> **[Hackers Use Nvidia GPUs to Crack WiFi](https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-gpu-wifi-hack,6483.html)**
>
> Most people grumble and complain about the high cost of top end GPUs. Now it appears that these GPUs are cost-effective ways to breach wireless network encryption.Russian Hackers reportedly broke through WPA and WPA2 encryption using a brute force...

> Russian Hackers reportedly broke through WPA and WPA2 encryption [using a brute force attack coupled with Nvidia’s GPUs](http://www.scmagazineuk.com/WiFi-is-no-longer-a-viable-secure-connection/article/119294/). With no mention of which specific card was used in the discovery, the card supposedly increased password recovery up to **10,000 percent faster**. Reports at this time are quite vague on the details, but if the claims hold any water at all, security experts could have a serious issue on their hands…

> Brute force decryption of WPA and WPA2 systems using parallel processing has been on the theoretical possibilities horizon for quite some time now – and presumably employed by relevant government agencies in extreme situations. If tech savvy hackers at home get the chance to tap the power of GPUs for this purpose, a whole can of worms is about to open.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theblue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/theblue/32/5074_2.png) [@theblue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/theblue)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/2 "2008-10-16T11:01:32Z")

</div>

very interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boxxa](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boxxa/32/5045_2.png) [@boxxa](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boxxa)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/3 "2008-10-16T11:06:10Z")

</div>

Ya this is gonna be a new wave of CPU intensive programming. Folding@home I think is already testing new software that used the idle GPU for folding too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/4 "2008-10-16T11:09:32Z")

</div>

old news!

but sweet stuff :tup:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:11am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/5 "2008-10-16T11:11:15Z")

</div>

exactly… if a single GPU can process that much data, imagine what 15 or 20 (or more) can do in parallel.

I wonder if this the end of traditional encryption as we know it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/6 "2008-10-16T11:13:44Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Stevil](#):
>
> I wonder if this the end of traditional encryption as we know it

lol

no

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/7 "2008-10-16T11:20:07Z")

</div>

Just about anyone with enough know how and the $$$ to spend could create a farm dedicated to brute forcing encryption algorithms. the sky is the limit

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/8 "2008-10-16T11:28:12Z")

</div>

You think the government doesn’t already have that?

Regardless

This isn’t breaking algorithms…this is brute forcing random password attempts agaisnt an encryption scheme…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clean\_Baldy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/clean_baldy/32/7308_2.png) [@Clean\_Baldy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Clean_Baldy)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/9 "2008-10-16T11:31:54Z")

</div>

The key words are “Brute force”

it’s not actually re-calculating any algorithms. It’s just guessing really really fast…

It’ll still take a million years for it to crack a 17 character code.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/10 "2008-10-16T11:35:16Z")

</div>

Cracking a 21 letter/number/symbol password

Number of Keys a Desktop Computer Can Try efficiently in an Hour(=2\*2^33) 17,179,869,184

```
	Estimated Gross Number of hours to Crack 236,621,177,025,198,000.00 
	On Distributed Level: 9,859,215,709,383,240.00 
	If Number of Machines Employed were:	
	 10.00 23,662,117,702,519,800.00 
	 50.00 4,732,423,540,503,950.00 
	 100.00 2,366,211,770,251,980.00 
	 250.00 946,484,708,100,791.00 
	 500.00 473,242,354,050,395.00 
	 1,000.00 236,621,177,025,198.00 
	 10,000.00 23,662,117,702,519.80 
	 100,000.00 2,366,211,770,251.98

```

[http://www.mandylionlabs.com/documents/BFTCalc.xls](http://www.mandylionlabs.com/documents/BFTCalc.xls)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 11:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gpus-too-powerful-for-their-own-good/56558/11 "2008-10-16T11:48:31Z")

</div>

oh, I see what you mean
